On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Paul Moore <p...@paul-moore.com> wrote: > On Sunday, November 01, 2015 06:24:32 PM Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: >> When fetching an inode's security label, check if it is still valid, and >> try reloading it if it is not. Reloading will fail when we are in RCU >> context which doesn't allow sleeping, or when we can't find a dentry for >> the inode. (Reloading happens via iop->getxattr which takes a dentry >> parameter.) When reloading fails, continue using the old, invalid >> label. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agrue...@redhat.com> >> Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <s...@tycho.nsa.gov> > > Generally I would say that you made enough changes between v4 and v5 that > Stephen's ACK should have been dropped,
Sorry, my mistake. > but considering that he suggested the changes I think's it's okay to leave it > as-is. > > Stephen, I'm reviewing/merging these changes now for the selinux#next-queue, > speak up if you have want your ACK removed. Thanks, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
