Linux-Setup Digest #714, Volume #19 Thu, 28 Sep 00 00:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: X configuration blues ("The Unforgiven")
Re: how to unzip the file *.tar.bz2 (Thomas Regner)
Re: newbie (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Xos=E9?= Calvo)
Apache access (Bruce Greeff)
Re: uugetty - Dial-in from hell (Clifford Kite)
Re: Red Hat 6.2 security and stability? (Robert Surenko)
Re: uugetty - Dial-in from hell (Timothy Murphy)
Re: X configuration blues (Chronocidal Charlie)
Vexing RedHat 6.2 install problem: Signal 7 (jbrown)
Re: Installation hangs at end (RedHat 6.2) (johnnyb)
Mandrake Boot Problems (Diego Rivera)
Re: Red Hat 6.2 security and stability? (Stewart Honsberger)
Diamond MonsterSound/original drivers? (Don Johnson)
Adaptec AAA-131U2 Raid controller HELP! ("Dan")
HELP: How to use FTP or should I turn to Windows (Sharon Wang)
Unicom Or Surecom EP325 LAN card (Holy)
Re: Extended partition trouble (Michael Iwaki)
Re: dpkg install error - ldso (Paul Kimoto)
Timeserver for RH 6.1 or 6.2 ("jhuman")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "The Unforgiven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: X configuration blues
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 17:21:47 -0500
I am using 3.3.6
"Lonni J. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
> The Unforgiven wrote:
> >
> > I am facing a strange problem with my X configuration. I have a SiS-5598
> > video card with 4 MB of VRAM. The problem is that the probe on the card
> > returns a default setting of 1024x768 16 bits, but when I use this the
> > screen has a lot of disturbance. If I use a resolution any lesser than
> > 1024x768 most of the windows dont fit into the desktop and if I use a 8
bit
> > color palette, applications like acrobat reader and real player dont
> > function properly.
> > Any suggestions on this? Is the VRAM not enough or is it a problem with
the
> > video card?
>
> its most likely a problem with the version of X you're using. Unless
> its 3.3.6, you need to upgrade.
------------------------------
From: Thomas Regner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: how to unzip the file *.tar.bz2
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:42:43 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Unrot13 this;
> Reply to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>=20
> Gene Heskett sends Greetings to Stephen Kennedy;
>=20
> SK> "Scott Nolde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> SK> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> qiuyang wrote:
> >> >
> >> > hi,everyone
> >> > I don't know how to unzip the file with tar.bz2 ?
>=20
> SK> You can do it all in one too:
>=20
> SK> tar xvfz file.tar.gz
> SK> tar xvfI file.tar.bz2
>=20
> I don't think this is correct since the f has to be the last option
> given. Well, actually, the next option after the f is the filename.
Incorrect for most tar-versions I used.
I can=B4t remember using f as the last switch (I=B4m used to use it as th=
e=20
second option) since 7 years, the f just tells tar that the next=20
whitespace-seperated option after the switches-option (xfvI ;-)) is the=20
archive-name.
regards
tom
> tar xzvf filename.tar.gz
> tar xIvf filename.tar.bz2
>=20
> Should be the correct syntax.
>=20
> Cheers, Gene
--=20
------------------------------
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Xos=E9?= Calvo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: newbie
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 22:27:12 GMT
> Im A newbie to Linus i have red hat 6.2 i want to insall it and test i=
t=20
out
> to see what its all about
> can some1 point me in the right direction as to how to insall it an=20
should i
> do a full install and or a workstation
> plus what a gnone :)
> Newbie so be gentle
First question: Do you want to install Linux on a computer alone or with=
=20
another Operating System (Windows)?
If on its own, let RedHat do everything. Just answer Yes.
If you would like to have both Windows and Linux on the same box, you=20
have to consider 'partitions'. Partitions of a disk are like making the =
computer believe you have several hard disks, not just one. Ask about=20
partitions in this newsgroup.
Gnome: In Windows or Macintosh you have a desktop, icons, etc. It's=20
always the same. In Linux, you have a variety of =93Desktops=94. One of =
them=20
is Gnome. Another one is KDE. Others are AnotherStep, NeXT, ICE,....=20
Think of them as different graphical approaches.
------------------------------
From: Bruce Greeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Apache access
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 01:13:36 +0200
Dumb newbie question.
I can not configure the apache users / groups using linuxconf under
Redhat 6.2.
The option just shows quit as an option.
When I try to access the site I get "you do not have permission to
access / on..."
Any help gratefully accepted.
Bruce
------------------------------
From: Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: uugetty - Dial-in from hell
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 18:05:42 -0500
Bill Unruh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (C Simic) writes:
> ]# Serial lines
> ]s2:12345:respawn:/sbin/uugetty ttyS1 38400 vt100
> You are on ttyS1, so call this S1. Don't confuse yourself.
Here's an uugetty line from an inittab that I used years ago:
d3:2:respawn:/sbin/uugetty -d /etc/default/uugetty.ttyS1 ttyS1 38400 vt100 LDISC0
It's probably not as sophisticated as it could be but I was pretty raw
at doing such things then. Still, it worked to connect to my office.
If you want the other configuration files associated with this then
ask and I'll send them via email. Uugetty doen't seem to be actively
supported now and a switch to mgetty might well be in order, as
suggested by Bill Unruh.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* In my book, the first poster to resort to personal abuse in a Usenet
debate loses by default. - Rod Smith */
------------------------------
From: Robert Surenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Red Hat 6.2 security and stability?
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.networking
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 23:37:50 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking James Hedgespeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can buy SSH from SSH Communications (www.ssh.com). It works really well,
> is point and click, easy to install, and well worth the money. Just to let you
> know, I don't work there, I'm just a user.
I prefer openssh ... it works as well as the pricy stuff and it's
free.
--
=============================================================================
- Bob Surenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.fred.net/surenko/
=============================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Murphy)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: uugetty - Dial-in from hell
Date: 28 Sep 2000 00:59:12 +0100
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Here's an uugetty line from an inittab that I used years ago:
>d3:2:respawn:/sbin/uugetty -d /etc/default/uugetty.ttyS1 ttyS1 38400 vt100 LDISC0
>It's probably not as sophisticated as it could be but I was pretty raw
>at doing such things then. Still, it worked to connect to my office.
Is it necessary (or desirable) to be "sophisticated"?
I've used the following mgetty line in inittab for years without problems:
S0:12345:respawn:/usr/local/sbin/mgetty -x 5 ttyS0
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel: 086-233 6090
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
------------------------------
From: Chronocidal Charlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: X configuration blues
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:01:01 GMT
If it's flicker you're getting, you may have to trim out one or some of
the higher vertical frequency mode lines for your monitor. For example
the monitor I use with an STB Velocity 128 card, even though it's
supposed to do 1024x768 interlaced at 86.958 KHz flickers like hell at
that setting if I select the interlaced setting under generic settings
in xf86cinfig #4 for the particular monitor, so I set it at setting #7
for high frequency SVGA, and even then sometimes on different systems it
will wind up with a higher line in the config file that the system
thinks it can run under and I get the flicker. I just edit the
XF86Config and commit out all the mode lines for anything higher than, I
believe it's 67 KHz and it solves the problem. Right now I'm running it
with XFree86 4.01 and I had to do the same thing with it. But for just a
16 meg video card and semi generic monitor, I get 1024x768 or any
virtual screen up 1600 x 1200 quit well at 24 depth. Guess it's 64
million colors or something.
Hope this helps.
Charlie
In article <8qt7gn$h66$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"The Unforgiven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am facing a strange problem with my X configuration. I have a
SiS-5598
> video card with 4 MB of VRAM. The problem is that the probe on the
card
> returns a default setting of 1024x768 16 bits, but when I use this the
> screen has a lot of disturbance.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: jbrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Vexing RedHat 6.2 install problem: Signal 7
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 17:39:22 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============F929A9193B4B339726F79368
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Good Morning,
>
> I went to a Redhat Linux version 6.2 class last month. Finally got
> the
> cd(I was suppose to get in class) last week. I'll had nothing but
> problems. Finally I changed the cd rom to a Sony from a NEC and now I
>
> am getting a signal 7 error.
>
> Configuration:
> Dell
> Pentium 200 MMX
> 128 Meg memory
> Sony cd rom drive modelcdu701
> I went to Redhat and got the the latest anconda updates, same problem
>
> Any answers or insights to how you fix a signal 7 error?
>
> Thanks
==============F929A9193B4B339726F79368
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="jackie.brown.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for jbrown
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="jackie.brown.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Brown;Jackie
tel;fax:650.654.5096
tel;work:650.506.8117
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Oracle;Worldwide Solutions Support Group
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Product Support Specialist
adr;quoted-printable:;;500 Opacle Parkway=0D=0AOPL - B2047=0D=0A;Redwood
Shores;California;94065;United States
fn:Jackie Brown
end:vcard
==============F929A9193B4B339726F79368==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (johnnyb)
Subject: Re: Installation hangs at end (RedHat 6.2)
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:56:31 GMT
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000 10:20:55 -0400, "Bob Nemeth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I also had this In my case I think it's to an improperly configured
> Monitor I have a Komodo Monitor which isn't supported tried to use other settings
> finaly set it to general and the basic level video support of 640x480 8bit and got
>threw the install
> maybe could help you ? Good luck
>I'm installing RedHat on a couple of old machines laying around the office
>(Pentium 100's). On one of the machines, the installation goes fine, except
>that at the end, after all the packages are installed, it hangs while
>"Performing post install configuration...".
>
>Does anyone have any ideas??
>
>Thanks.
>
> Bob
>
------------------------------
From: Diego Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mandrake Boot Problems
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 01:47:58 GMT
Hi all!
I've recently installed Mandrake 7.1 on my Athlon 700MHz, 256MB @ my
office.
It used to be running Mandrake 6.0 (which I still have on a separate
drive), but now some weird shit problems have arisen:
1) First installation went fine, but when booting Mandrake for the first
time it died starting the hard drive optimizations for my second hard
disk (mind you, I need it to move a lot of work and stuff to the new
hard
drive).
2) Second installation went fine, and before booting, I copied the
2.2.16 kernel/modules/everything over and created the image for it in
lilo. This installation booted fine (except some weird "missing
symbols" problems) - even all the way to KDE, and I got to copy most of
my stuff over from the old HD over to the new one. BUT (this is the
kicker), I changed /etc/inittab to have 8 tty's active (Alt-F1 thru
Alt-F8, Alt-F9 = X11 ). Now, it locks up when it tries to start httpd
(apache) !!!!!! As if that wasn't weird enough, I try using Interactive
startup, and skip httpd. After this, it boots "fine", but when it comes
time to start X, it locks up again on a black screen!!
Tomorrow I'm going to try removing the old hard drive and seeing if it
boots correctly, but what gets me is: How can it be locking up while
starting APACHE of all things!?!??!?!
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
BTW: Video card is an nVidia RIVA 128ZX (I know!!! but how can a
programmer justify buying a bigger-badder-better video card when he's
not supposed to be playing games??? :) )
What's weird is that the first boot, X started fine!!!! NO PROBLEMS!!!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stewart Honsberger)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: Red Hat 6.2 security and stability?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 02:34:43 GMT
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 23:37:50 GMT, Robert Surenko wrote:
>In comp.os.linux.networking James Hedgespeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You can buy SSH from SSH Communications (www.ssh.com). It works really well,
>> is point and click, easy to install, and well worth the money. Just to let
>> you know, I don't work there, I'm just a user.
>
>I prefer openssh ... it works as well as the pricy stuff and it's
>free.
IMNSHO, it's much better than the commercial SSH. OpenSSH supports SSH1 and
SSH2 right out of the box. Only certain versions of SSH support both
protocols.
Also, I like having source code.
--
Stewart Honsberger (AKA Blackdeath) @ http://tinys.cx/blackdeath
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Remove 'thirteen' to reply privately)
Humming along under SuSE 6.4, Linux 2.4.0-test6
------------------------------
From: Don Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Diamond MonsterSound/original drivers?
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 22:29:11 -0400
Do they exist for linux?
--
---
Don R. Johnson
------------------------------
From: "Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Adaptec AAA-131U2 Raid controller HELP!
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 22:48:39 -0400
Could anyone point me in the right direction concerning a newly purchased
Adaptec AAA-131U2 Raid controller.
I'm installing RedHat 6.2 overt FTP, and the fdisk sees three disks, not one
as I suspect it should be.
Has anyone set this up yet with any success or point me in the right
direction to find some docs.
Controller : aaa-131U2
Disks: 3 x Quantum Atlas V 18.3 GB
Raid 5 configuration
Thx!
Dan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Sharon Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: HELP: How to use FTP or should I turn to Windows
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 23:02:03 -0400
==============D7FF7B6CB0B02170513367A9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Can someone point to me the things I should look
at in order to get ftp work under RedHat 6.x?
Symptom: I've never been able to login!
Connected to host.domain
220 host.domain FTP server (Version wu-2.5.0(1) Tue Sep 21 16:48:12 EDT
1999) ready.
Name (host:me): me
331 Password required for me.
Password:
530 Login incorrect.
Login failed.
ftp> quit
Here are the things I have and have checked
Files:
/etc/passwd (has non root user "me", group is also "me"
/etc/shadow (generated by pwconv)
/etc/group (defined group id "me")
/etc/inetd.conf
/etc/ftpaccess
/etc/ftpusers ("me" is not there)
/etc/identd.conf
/usr/sbin/tcpd
/usr/sbin/in.ftpd (wu-2.5.0(1))
/usr/sbin/identd
/var/log/messages (says: ftpd[13]: cmd failure, etc.)
/var/log/secure
Someone suggested look at /dev/tty, well, it's crw--rw--rw-.
I suspect teh ftp client sends some thing to the server
which is misinterpreted by the sever as bad user
name and/or password.
==============D7FF7B6CB0B02170513367A9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<tt>Can someone point to me the things I should look</tt>
<br><tt>at in order to get ftp work under RedHat 6.x?</tt><tt></tt>
<p><tt>Symptom: I've never been able to login!</tt><tt></tt>
<p><tt>Connected to host.domain</tt>
<br><tt>220 host.domain FTP server (Version wu-2.5.0(1) Tue Sep 21 16:48:12
EDT</tt>
<br><tt>1999) ready.</tt>
<br><tt>Name (host:me): me</tt>
<br><tt>331 Password required for me.</tt>
<br><tt>Password:</tt>
<br><tt>530 Login incorrect.</tt>
<br><tt>Login failed.</tt>
<br><tt>ftp> quit</tt><tt></tt>
<p><tt>Here are the things I have and have checked</tt><tt></tt>
<p><tt>Files:</tt>
<br><tt>/etc/passwd (has non root user "me", group is also "me"</tt>
<br><tt>/etc/shadow (generated by pwconv)</tt>
<br><tt>/etc/group (defined group id "me")</tt>
<br><tt>/etc/inetd.conf</tt>
<br><tt>/etc/ftpaccess</tt>
<br><tt>/etc/ftpusers ("me" is not there)</tt>
<br><tt>/etc/identd.conf</tt>
<br><tt>/usr/sbin/tcpd</tt>
<br><tt>/usr/sbin/in.ftpd (wu-2.5.0(1))</tt>
<br><tt>/usr/sbin/identd</tt><tt></tt>
<p><tt>/var/log/messages (says: ftpd[13]: cmd failure, etc.)</tt>
<br><tt>/var/log/secure</tt><tt></tt>
<p><tt>Someone suggested look at /dev/tty, well, it's crw--rw--rw-.</tt><tt></tt>
<p><tt>I suspect teh ftp client sends some thing to the server</tt>
<br><tt>which is misinterpreted by the sever as bad user</tt>
<br><tt>name and/or password.</tt>
<br><tt></tt> </html>
==============D7FF7B6CB0B02170513367A9==
------------------------------
From: Holy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Unicom Or Surecom EP325 LAN card
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 11:55:27 +0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is a Realtek 8019(AS) chipset LAN card, how to set up it in linux?
I use Redhat 6.2, but it can't detect it.
Do I need to set the LAN card in jumperless mode or PnP mode?
Anyone can kindly help me?
Thx a lot!
-Holy
------------------------------
From: Michael Iwaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Extended partition trouble
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 03:51:31 GMT
I don't understand the way your partitions are setup, but I want to ask you what
you used to create the extended partition with logical drives. As a wild guess
to your problem, if you used Windows 98se or Partition Magic v.4 or 5, there is a
"problem" with those programs creating extended partitions: As far as I know,
they use Microsoft's own type of extended partition (type 'OF') instead of the
regular extended partition (type '05'). Type '05' is the one normally used as
the extended partition "wrapping" or enclosing logical drives. The type 'OF'
extended partition type is recognized only by Microsoft's OS (it was invented by
Microsoft) and the other OS's don't recognize it as an extended partition. If
you can get a hold of a partition table editor, like ptedit.exe, you can check to
see what partition type is being used as an extended partition.
Also, as for bootable partitions, keep the bootable partitions completely within
the 1024 cylinder limit (within 8.4Gb).
Michael Iwaki
peracchi wrote:
> Hi everbody, Please help, I've got myself in a bad problem. ANY comments/help
> is much appreciated. In short, I installed win98se in one partition
> (primary), a few days later, i installed linux (eDesktop 2.4) in a logical
> partition inside a extended partition. System Commander controls the boot
> process. After boot in linux, the system will not boot anymore unless i use
> some program to mark the first primary partition as active. Now, if the
> above isn't enough to catch the problem here are the details: I have a
> Fujistu 12GB HD that is partitioned as bellow:
>
> | primary | primary | primary | extended (9397MB) (hda4) | | 604MB |
> 604MB | 902MB | 101MB | 3004MB | 2000MB | 4290MB | | Win98SE |
> Win98SE | WinME | linux swap | linux ext2 | linux ext2 | fat32 | | hda1
> | hda2 | hda3 | hda5 | hda6 | hda7 | hda8 |
>
> When i choose boot the linux in hda7, System Commander marks hda4 (extended)
> and hda7 as bootable. After i reboot the system, System Commander don't
> appear anymore. Instead i receive a message asking for a boot/system disk. I
> need use SCDISK from System Commander to mark hda1 as bootable to the system
> boot again and System Commander take control. Another way is run cfdisk in
> linux before reboot to mark hda1 as bootable.
>
> What is wrong? In other situations i already use System Commander with a
> configuration like this and have no trouble. Lilo is installed on hda7.
>
> Thanks for help!
>
> P.S.: sorry for my poor english! ;^)
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Subject: Re: dpkg install error - ldso
Date: 27 Sep 2000 23:55:12 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <8qtkns$hkn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tom Bebee wrote:
> I have downloaded
> the .deb file and run the following command:
>
> dpkg -i ldso_1.9.11-9.deb
>
> The following error is generated:
>
> dpkg: regarding ldso_1.9.11-9.deb containing libc6, pre-dependency
> problem:
> libc6 pre-depends on ldso (>= 1.9.11-2.1)
> ldso is installed, but is version 1.9.10-1.
> dpkg: error processing ldso_1.9.11-9.deb (--install):
> pre-dependency problem - not installing libc6
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> ldso_1.9.11-9.deb
>
> I did not see that ldso had any dependencies, so I cannot understand the
> reference to libc6.
>
> Can anyone explain, what the error is telling me.
Actually, sounds like there might be a bug somewhere.
Which version of Debian do you have now?
You might try an earlier distribution's version of xntp, e.g.,
xntp3_5.93-3.deb in
ftp://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/dists/slink/main/binary-i386/net .
Alternatively, you might try installing both ldso and libc6 at the same
time, something like
$ dpkg -i ldso_1.9.11-9.deb libc6_2.1.3-13.deb
(note that you want -13, not -10, for the most recent security fixes).
Is there a reason why you aren't using apt-get(8)?
> --
> Tom Bebee
> Welch Allyn Inc.
> Skaneateles, Falls NY
--
Paul Kimoto Ithaca, NY
This message was originally posted on Usenet in plain text. Any images,
hyperlinks, or the like shown here have been added without my consent,
and may be a violation of international copyright law.
------------------------------
From: "jhuman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.linux,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.portable,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Timeserver for RH 6.1 or 6.2
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:04:08 -0400
Does anyone know where I can find a timeserver (Redhat) for my internal LAN?
thx in advance....
--
JD Durick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AT&T Laboratories, ISC
Washington, DC
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.setup) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************
