Linux-Setup Digest #833, Volume #20 Thu, 15 Mar 01 05:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Simple Question (newbie) (David)
Re: Kernel 2.4.2 problems - Modules / Debian ("Peter T. Breuer")
bind upgrade 9.1 ("John Jr")
Re: 'bad magic number in superblock' error ("Eric")
Re: compile error - gcc (Frank Neurath)
HD Partition, The Sequel ("Sri Panyam")
XFree86 & Cirrus Problem ("Emmanuek Kerverdo")
Re: need help on initial setup (Benoit Mordelet)
partition question (PkingTom)
Re: kernel panic : VFS : can not mount root fs (ingo korndoerfer)
network configuration (PkingTom)
Netgear FA 311 NIC ("Steven Horsley")
Re: network configuration ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: compile error - gcc (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?=)
Re: nfs server problem (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?=)
Re: help with iptables script (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?=)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Simple Question (newbie)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 07:12:13 GMT
Greg Hains wrote:
>
> Could somebody please tell me the command sequence for finding a file on
> one's Linux (Mandrake 7.2) system when looking for specific text within it,
> and from level it searches from (current directory I assume).
> I'm not sure if it's LOCATE, FIND, WHEREIS or what.
>
> Sorry to bother you - it's driving me crazy. Please help
>
> Greg Hains
find / -type f \( -name "filename" \) -exec grep "text to find" {} \;
If you only want it to search a users home directory you can replace the
/ after find with ~/ or the directory you want to search like "/bin"
and the "filename" with the file you are looking for.
If it is run as a user any file the user doesn't have permissions to it
will list files as Permission denied.
--
Confucius say: He who play in root, eventually kill tree.
Registered with the Linux Counter. http://counter.li.org
ID # 123538
Completed more W/U's than 99.108% of seti users. +/- 0.01%
------------------------------
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4.2 problems - Modules / Debian
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:00:16 +0100
Frank Preut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <tXAr6.5031$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Young wrote:
>>Can someone walk me through updating my modutils package on my Debian
>>system?
> you may want to go to the debian website and search the mailing
> list archives for an answer.. i am 100% sure that someone has packaged
> the latest modutils for potato systems (you need the latest version to
> build a 2.4.x kernel)..
It's not necessary
cd /tmp
apt-get source binutils (put some deb-src lines in your apt/sources.list)
cd binutils-blah
make -f debian/rules
sudo make -f debian/rules binary
cd ..
sudo dpkg -i binutils_blah.deb
Peter
------------------------------
From: "John Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bind upgrade 9.1
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 23:23:06 -0800
I d/l bind9 to /usr/local/downloads and ran a tar -zxvf bind-9.0.1.tar.gz
then I followed the simple instructions to install Bind the
usually./configure, make, and then make install.
Everything seems to install properly, but the binaries I think are still
from 8.2.3.
The script in /etc/rc.d/init.d/named still shows a "status" of 8.2.3. Could
some please help me finish this install? Also where is the replacement
script for the new 9 named?
Regards,
John Jr.
------------------------------
From: "Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat
Subject: Re: 'bad magic number in superblock' error
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:31:36 +0100
> > So we need more info.
> > On what partition does it fail.
>
> It is at the stage where fsck.ext is run on the /dev/hda1 partition. The
> exact error it gives is follows:
>
> "Checking filesystems
> fsck.ext(null):
> The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2
> filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2
filesystem
> (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock is corrupt,
and
> you might try running e2fsck with an alternative superblock: e2fsck -b
8193
> <device>
Have you tried this?
> : Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/hda1
[FAILED]"
>
> > Did it function before?
>
> Yes it did. Then I reinstalled Win ME and now it doesn't work.
bad news.
Let's hope Win didn't touch hda1
I do need that fdisk listing to tell more.
> > Can you boot your linux system? Perhaps through a rescue system?
>
> I'm currently using the Linux boot floppy that the installation created.
At
> the LILO prompt I use 'linux 3' to get the system to run in console mode.
Okay, than at least the root fs isn't fully wrecked.
Make an fdisk listing from here, and try to run e2fsck on /dev/hda1, with
the
following alternative superblock: 32768
Now let's hope it exists and is intact.
If it doesn't exist, you probably need to reformat that partition, and
restore
(from backup?) whatever was there.
basically it contains:
ls -l /boot
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Oct 4 18:39 System.map ->
System.map-
2.2.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 186704 Apr 20 1999 System.map-2.2.5-15
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 512 Jun 22 1999 boot.0300
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4544 Apr 13 1999 boot.b
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 612 Apr 13 1999 chain.b
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 329872 Jun 22 1999 initrd-2.2.5-15.img
-rw------- 1 root root 43520 Jan 22 14:09 map
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 617288 Apr 20 1999 vmlinuz-2.2.5-15
map/chain.b/boot/b/boot.0300 are from lilo (reinstall it if needed)
System.map is probably in your /usr/src/linux/ (Not really needed)
vmlinuz is probably in /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/ (and is called bzImage
there)
whether you need an initrd depends on your setup.
Eric
------------------------------
From: Frank Neurath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: compile error - gcc
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:46:46 +0100
Nick Traxler wrote:
>
> I am trying to replace the compiler packaged with redhat
> 7 (gcc 2.96) with the current stable release, 2.95.2.
> But, the compile dies with what appears to be incorrect
> code. I'm running a pentium2/300 w/ 192 MB.
> Does anyone have suggestions? Or, are there RPMs
> anywhere? (I've looked on gcc.gnu.org, but I didn't
> see anything)
>
> Any help is appreciated!
>
> Here's the error dialog:
>
> ../../../gcc-2.95.2/libio/indstream.cc:82: `struct streampos' used where
> a `int' was expected
> ../../../gcc-2.95.2/libio/indstream.cc:85: `struct streampos' used where
> a `int' was expected
> ../../../gcc-2.95.2/libio/indstream.cc:87: `struct streampos' used where
> a `int' was expected
> ../../../gcc-2.95.2/libio/indstream.cc:89: conversion from `int' to
> non-scalar type `streampos' requested
> ../../../gcc-2.95.2/libio/indstream.cc: In method `struct streampos
> indirectbuf::seekpos(_G_fpos64_t, int = 3)':
> ../../../gcc-2.95.2/libio/indstream.cc:99: `struct streampos' used where
> a `int' was expected
> ../../../gcc-2.95.2/libio/indstream.cc:102: `struct streampos' used
> where a `int' was expected
> ../../../gcc-2.95.2/libio/indstream.cc:104: `struct streampos' used
> where a `int' was expected
> ../../../gcc-2.95.2/libio/indstream.cc:106: conversion from `int' to
> non-scalar type `streampos' requested
> make[2]: *** [indstream.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libio'
> make[1]: *** [all-target-libio] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/build'
> make: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2
> --
> Nick Traxler
> Computer Science, Purdue University
> http://www.cs.purdue.edu/people/traxlend
>
> "The two most common things in the Universe are Hydrogen and Stupidity."
gcc-2.95.2 does not compile with glibc-2.2.2 !
You have to patch gcc. Check: http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html
Frank
------------------------------
From: "Sri Panyam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HD Partition, The Sequel
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:05:36 GMT
Hi
A couple-o-days ago i wondered how I could partition my existing linux
partition (the only one on the hard disk) without erasing any data so that I
could put in windows.
So some one suggested I use gnu's "parted" program. So I downloaded it and
tried to compile it. So each time i ./configure and make it it crashes with
the following error:
program as failed.
I assume its sayin that the assembler is buggy. Any Ideas?
Now as to why I want to install an inferior product like windows in the
first place, well here it is:
My Linux PC has 32 mb of ram with the kernel 2.4 in it.
I have 2 network cards. One of the cards is used for my home LAN and the
other one is connected to my cable ISP. As u would have guessed I am using
this linux box as a gateway to other PCs in my LAN. So any hooo I got all
the dhcp and all working and the NIC connected to the cable (eth1) gives me
speeds of 5 k a second. I have put the exact same card (literally) onto a
slower windows 98 machine with 16 mb of ram and i get speeds of upto 250 k a
second fo rthe same file. So I wanted to see if windows on the linux
machine could help me out here.
When i did an ifconfig, there were an incredibly high number of frame errors
in reception of packets:
LAN
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:AD:04:A9:D7
inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.127 Mask:255.255.255.128
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2720 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:3017 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:9 Base address:0xfc00
CABLE:
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:AD:72:93:20
inet addr:203.164.100.223 Bcast:203.164.100.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2648 errors:530 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:530
TX packets:2181 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:5 Base address:0xf800
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3904 Metric:1
RX packets:7 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:7 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
So can some body help me out here.. I am stuck with this for a month without
a solution.
Sri
------------------------------
From: "Emmanuek Kerverdo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: XFree86 & Cirrus Problem
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:27:09 +0100
Hi,
I'm trying to install Linux (2.2.17) on a old HP Vectra 486s/33N, which is
using a Cirrus CL-GD5434-HC-B Chipset. But I have a problem with XFree86
(Version 4.0.1c): Xserver will not start because of a fatal error (Caugth
signal 11).
Do you think the video card is not supported, or is it just a configuration
problem, or something else ?...
Thank you very much for your help,
Emmanuel
Here are the last lines of the corresponding XFree86 log file:
(II) LoadModule: "cirrus"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/cirrus_drv.o
(II) Module cirrus: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.0.0
Module class: XFree86 Video Driver
ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3
(II) LoadModule: "mouse"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/input/mouse_drv.o
(II) Module mouse: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.0.0
Module class: XFree86 XInput Driver
ABI class: XFree86 XInput driver, version 0.1
(II) CIRRUS: driver for Cirrus chipsets: CLGD5430, CLGD5434-4, CLGD5434-8,
CLGD5436, CLGD5446, CLGD5480, CL-GD5462, CL-GD5464, CL-GD5464BD,
CL-GD5465, CL-GD7548
(II) Primary Device is: ISA
Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11. Server aborting
------------------------------
From: Benoit Mordelet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: need help on initial setup
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:27:46 +0100
Jeff a �crit :
>
> I've been fruitlessly trying to get my Win 98 Celeron 366 w/ 128 MB RAM to
> load a Red Hat 6.0 distribution of Linux (repackaged by a company called
> NetPC). The HD is16 GB with a 2.0GB C: partitition formatted with FAT16
> for multibooting. I have 1 GB of freespace on an extendedpartition available
> for Linux. I successfully boot to the Linux CD-rom, and the installation
> wizard asks me to specify "new install", "update existing", or "dual-boot".
> I've
[SNIP]
> use to get this machine loaded? I'd sure like to hear from anyone who
> might have an idea or two.
well, if you never installed linux on this computer, trying "new
install" sounds like a good idea. if it doesn't work, just try some
"official" widespread distribution (i.e. not repackaged by anyone).
ben
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PkingTom)
Date: 15 Mar 2001 08:56:58 GMT
Subject: partition question
This is my first time using and installing Linux. I have a few questions.
I know they may have been asked before but I wanted to run my particular
situation by someone. I currently have 3 partitions on my machine. All 3 are
about 11GB each. One is a FAT32 primary partition. Then there is an extended
drive enclosing two logical FAT32 partitions. My first question is: What is a
good amount of space to install Redhat Linux 7.0? I used PartitionMagic to
create a Linux Ext2 partition and a Linux Swap Space. Then someone told me to
delete those and let the Linux automatic partition create the partition for me.
What is the best way to go?
Also, someone suggested to me that perhaps I should delete one of the
partitions and devote 11GB to Linux. Is that too much? Perhaps it would be
better if I cut the 3rd partition from 11GB to say 6GB, giving Linux about 5GB?
I'm using it for school and currently have Windows 98 in my machine. I'm not
planning on saving much on the Linux, we only might be writing some Unix shell
programs in C. But I noticed it takes some more space for things like games and
GNOME. I know i'm asking alot but if anyone can help with some suggestions I
would really appreciate it. Thanks
Tom
------------------------------
From: ingo korndoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kernel panic : VFS : can not mount root fs
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:04:33 +0100
hi svend olaf,
thanks for looking into my problem. i'll include the output from fext2.
can you point me to some, maybe not all too long blurb, how to
read and understand the outputs of fpart and fext2 ? i feel rather lost
...
(i just notice i overshot by running fext2 on the whole disk rather than
the
cylinders you recommended. lost the printout of your mail ... hope that
doesn't do any harm ... ).
thanks again
ingo
Findext2, version 1.1.
Copyright Svend Olaf Mikkelsen, 2000.
Searches for ext2 superblocks. False positives might be found.
The partition location can be wrong. MB might be used megabytes
especially if Block is 0. Mount/Write/Check are date/time if valid.
Write/Check might be GMT time. Block is superblock number. CHS is
superblock location. Note that cylinders are numbered from 0. Linux
fdisk numbers from 1.
OS: DOS 7.10 WINDOWS 4.10
Disk: 1 Cylinders: 776 Heads: 240 Sectors: 63 MB: 5729
Start cylinder: 0 End cylinder: 775
-PCyl N ID -----LBA -----Num ---MB -Start CHS- --End CHS-- BS CHS
Searched 100 0 1
Searched 200 0 1
0 - 83 3266029 4082337 1993 216 1 47 486 0 46 B0 OK
MB 1302
Mount 2001.02.09 23:39:52
Write 2001.02.12 22:15:46
Check 2001.02.12 22:15:46
Block 1
CHS 220/82/2
0 - 83 3659245 4082337 1993 242 3 17 512 2 16 B OK
MB 1302
Mount 2001.02.09 23:39:52
Write 2001.02.12 22:15:46
Check 2001.02.12 22:15:46
Block 3
CHS 255/4/4
0 - 83 4052461 4082337 1993 268 4 50 538 3 49 B OK
MB 1302
Mount 2001.02.09 23:39:52
Write 2001.02.12 22:15:46
Check 2001.02.12 22:15:46
Block 5
CHS 289/166/6
Searched 300 0 1
0 - 83 4445677 4082337 1993 294 6 20 564 5 19 B OK
MB 1302
Mount 2001.02.09 23:39:52
Write 2001.02.12 22:15:46
Check 2001.02.12 22:15:46
Block 7
CHS 324/88/8
0 - 83 4838893 4082337 1993 320 7 53 590 6 52 B OK
MB 1302
Mount 2001.02.09 23:39:52
Write 2001.02.12 22:15:46
Check 2001.02.12 22:15:46
Block 9
CHS 359/10/10
Searched 400 0 1
0 - 83 7151823 4339377 2118 473 1 1 759 239 63 B0 OK
MB 929
Mount 2001.02.18 12:33:14
Write 2001.02.18 12:53:41
Check 2001.02.12 22:16:07
Block 0
CHS 473/1/3
0 - 83 7348429 4339377 2118 486 1 47 773 0 46 B0 OK
MB 924
Mount 2001.02.09 22:41:24
Write 2001.02.12 22:16:07
Check 2001.02.12 22:16:07
Block 1
CHS 490/82/2
Searched 500 0 1
0 - 83 7741645 4339377 2118 512 3 17 799 2 16 B OK
MB 924
Mount 2001.02.09 22:41:24
Write 2001.02.12 22:16:07
Check 2001.02.12 22:16:07
Block 3
CHS 525/4/4
0 - 83 8134861 4339377 2118 538 4 50 825 3 49 B0 OK
MB 924
Mount 2001.02.09 22:41:24
Write 2001.02.12 22:16:07
Check 2001.02.12 22:16:07
Block 5
CHS 559/166/6
0 - 83 8528077 4339377 2118 564 6 20 851 5 19 B OK
MB 924
Mount 2001.02.09 22:41:24
Write 2001.02.12 22:16:07
Check 2001.02.12 22:16:07
Block 7
CHS 594/88/8
Searched 600 0 1
0 - 83 9223405 1572417 767 610 3 17 714 2 16 B0 OK
MB 12
Mount 0
Write 2000.09.20 23:36:56
Check 2000.09.20 23:36:54
Block 3
CHS 623/4/4
0 - 83 8921293 4339377 2118 590 7 53 877 6 52 B OK
MB 924
Mount 2001.02.09 22:41:24
Write 2001.02.12 22:16:07
Check 2001.02.12 22:16:07
Block 9
CHS 629/10/10
0 - 83 9616621 1572417 767 636 4 50 740 3 49 B0 OK
MB 12
Mount 0
Write 2000.09.20 23:36:56
Check 2000.09.20 23:36:54
Block 5
CHS 657/166/6
Searched 700 0 1
0 - 83 10720189 1209537 590 709 1 47 789 0 46 B OK
MB 9
Mount 0
Write 2000.09.20 23:36:58
Check 2000.09.20 23:36:57
Block 1
CHS 713/82/2
0 - 83 11113405 1209537 590 735 3 17 815 2 16 B OK
MB 9
Mount 0
Write 2000.09.20 23:36:58
Check 2000.09.20 23:36:57
Block 3
CHS 748/4/4
Svend Olaf Mikkelsen wrote:
> ingo korndoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >OS: DOS 7.10 WINDOWS 4.10
> >
> >Disk: 1 Cylinders: 776 Heads: 240 Sectors: 63 MB: 5729
> >
> >-PCyl N ID -----Rel -----Num ---MB -Start CHS- --End CHS-- BS CHS
> > 0 - 0B 63 3072000 1500 0 1 1 203 42 57 B OK
> > 473 1 83 63 4339377 2118 473 1 1 759 239 63 OK OK
> > 473 2 05 8421840 241920 118 760 0 1 775 239 63 203 OK
> > 675 1 82 63 256977 125 675 1 1 691 239 63 OK
> > 675 2 05 1890000 1209600 590 696 0 1 775 239 63 571 OK
> > 760 1 82 63 241857 118 760 1 1 775 239 63 OK
> >
> >-----FAT CHS -Size Cl --Root -Good -Rep. Maybe --Bad YYMMDD DataMB
> > 0 1 33 11423 4 180019 11423 0 0 0 1400
> >
> >Partitions according to partition tables on first harddisk:
> >
> >-PCyl N ID -----Rel -----Num ---MB -Start CHS- --End CHS-- BS CHS
> > 0 1*0B 63 3069297 1498 0 1 1 202 239 63 NB OK
> > 0 2 85 3069360 8663760 4230 203 0 1 775 239 63 OK
> > No signature CHS: 203 0 1
>
> So far one 2118 MB Linux ext2 partition was found. I guess this was
> your second Linux partition. This partition probably can be fully
> recovered.
>
> The FAT32 partition and the first ext2 partition are overlapping. If
> important data was in the first ext2 partition you must stop writing
> to the FAT32 partition.
>
> Tell me if you want to attempt to recover data from the first ext2
> partition. If yes, you can get Findext2 at my page, do:
>
> findext2 1 200 472 fe1-a.txt
>
> and post the content from fe1-a.txt.
> --
> Svend Olaf
> http://inet.uni2.dk/~svolaf/utilities.htm
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PkingTom)
Date: 15 Mar 2001 09:20:51 GMT
Subject: network configuration
I was installing Redhat Linux 7.0 and got stumped when I came upon the
network configuration. I am installing the workstation setup and it obviously
detected a network card. Do I have to worry about this information if I am
installing on my home computer? Info like the IP address, netmask, network,
broadcast, Gateway, primary DNS and so on? Or do I just skip this? I know that
my IP address practically switches everytime I sign on. For businesses i'm
assuming they are set things. Any help with this is appreciated. Thanks
Tom
------------------------------
From: "Steven Horsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Netgear FA 311 NIC
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:23:10 -0000
Please help!
Having successfully compiled a module for the card on Mandrake 7.2, and
added 'alias eth0 fa311' to /etc/modules.conf, everything seemed to be fine.
'eth0' starts at boot, but the card just does not function. 'ifconfig'
reveals the eth0, and it can ping itself but nothing else on the network. No
other machines can ping it.
Harddrake has no entries under Network Device Cards, but there is an entry
under Other Devices for the card which is listed as National Semiconductor
Corporation Unknown (the FA311's chip manufacturer).
The IP address etc. where set up on a previous card and can not now be
altered using Network Configurator. It simply vanishes when you click the
button.
Any advice will be gratefully received.
Thanks,
Steven Horsley
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: network configuration
Date: 15 Mar 2001 09:28:45 GMT
PkingTom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was installing Redhat Linux 7.0 and got stumped when I came upon the
> network configuration. I am installing the workstation setup and it obviously
> detected a network card. Do I have to worry about this information if I am
> installing on my home computer?
If your home computer is going to be hooked into a network (your home
network), you'd better read something about networking, the NET3-HOWTO
is Ok.
If your home computer is going to be hooked into your ISP
network (trough a modem), you will have to setup PPP for this,
see the PPP-HOWTO for more info.
If you have a network card, but you do not plan to use it, then simply
ignore the information.
BTW, imho is better to have some information about networking.
Davide
------------------------------
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: compile error - gcc
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:41:22 +0100
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Nick Traxler wrote:
> I am trying to replace the compiler packaged with redhat
> 7 (gcc 2.96) with the current stable release, 2.95.2.
> But, the compile dies with what appears to be incorrect
> code. I'm running a pentium2/300 w/ 192 MB.
> Does anyone have suggestions? Or, are there RPMs
> anywhere? (I've looked on gcc.gnu.org, but I didn't
> see anything)
Good idea to replace it :)
However gcc 2.95.2 does not compile out-of-the-box with glibc 2.2, which
RedHat 7 comes with.
So instead you could download a patched one - for example mine:
www.amagerkollegiet.dk/~moffe/
This one will compile and install fine on RedHat 7 (at least it did on
my box and a couple of others).
Good luck
Rasmus
------------------------------
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: nfs server problem
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:47:00 +0100
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Brian Jessup wrote:
> I can mount the directory I have exported from the host no problem.
> I can cat a file with no problem.
> I can vi a file but I CAN'T save it.
> It seems I can't write at all. The client just hang on the write. The
> strange thing is when I "touch" a file it gets created on the host
> but the touch command never comes back like the return path
> back to the client is not known.
Did you allow writes in /etc/exports? Do you have both hosts in _both_
/etc/hosts? Do you have 'order hosts' in /etc/resolv.conf? Do you use
the same NFS version (i.e. the same kernel version)?
Rasmus
------------------------------
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: help with iptables script
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:52:56 +0100
On 15 Mar 2001, Hung Ngoc Lai wrote:
> I would like to put squid (proxy server) on the linux box to
> utilize the web-caching capability. However, I would like to
> do it transparently without having explicitly to reconfigure
> the web browser to point to squid. I understand that this
> can be done. Squid will be running on port 3128. I would
> like to be able to intercept web traffic (http) from internal
> users and redirect it to the squid. If everything works out,
> I will migrate squid to another linux instead of running it
> on the linux gateway box. Can anyone give me the iptables
> script to make this happen?
You can download the iptables package from the wolverine (redhat 7.0.90
= 7.1 beta) - it has iptables-restore and iptables-save programs, which
iptables from RedHat 7.0 does not have.
Next go to the iptables-HOWTO:
http://netfilter.kernelnotes.org/
Specificaly what you want is (from the NAT-HOWTO) somethig like:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 80 \
-j REDIRECT --to-port 3128
Rasmus
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.setup.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************
