Linux-Setup Digest #36, Volume #21 Thu, 12 Apr 01 15:13:12 EDT
Contents:
vmlinuz too big? (Mark)
Re: vmlinuz too big? ("Eric")
Re: vmlinuz too big? ("Peter T. Breuer")
Re: kernel panic w/ kernel 2.4.2-1 -> VFS:Unable to mounth root fs on 03:44 ("Eric")
[2.4.3]: Problems with new aic7xxx driver (Sangohn Christian)
Re: Micron Netframe MV 5000 with AMI Megaraid problems (shane)
Re: rpm -- 'corrupt header' ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Newbie:recieving mail with linux ("Marcel Rijnen")
qmail: Adding disclaimer to Internet-bound emails? (Frederic Faure)
Problem with dual boot ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Problem with dual boot ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: need help installing linux ("JohnP")
Re: Suppressing Redhat bootup output (Wayne Pollock)
ls and ps quit working except under root (Frank E Harrell Jr)
HELP - /dev/fd0 has wrong major or minor number ("roshi")
Re: Monitor a task (Mathieu Brabant)
Re: How do I get rid of Red Hat 7's graphical LILO extension? ("Dominique Schuppli")
Re: How do I get rid of Red Hat 7's graphical LILO extension? (Rex Dieter)
Low X Window Resolution...........HELP!!! ("DAVID FITZGERALD")
unrecognized cdrom (David Harnsberger)
Re: Red Hat system start up (Gerard)
unrecognized cdrom (David Harnsberger)
Re: Yamaha PCI (Dell m/b) and 2.4 (bill davidsen)
Re: Low X Window Resolution...........HELP!!! (tech2kjason)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera
Subject: vmlinuz too big?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 06:11:03 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does it mean when lilo gives a Fatal: Kernel /boot/vmlinuz is too
big? It's only 1.5 Megs - what is the physical size limit on a
kernel????
(Trying to install Caldera on /dev/hda1 with 64Mb RAM, 2.0GB disk
space).
Thanks!
------------------------------
From: "Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera
Subject: Re: vmlinuz too big?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:58:21 +0200
> What does it mean when lilo gives a Fatal: Kernel /boot/vmlinuz is too
> big?
What do you think it means?
> It's only 1.5 Megs
uncompressed
> - what is the physical size limit on a kernel????
I don't know
> (Trying to install Caldera on /dev/hda1 with 64Mb RAM, 2.0GB disk
> space).
That's good.
> Thanks!
You're welcome.
But, you probably want to know what you did wrong?
You probably copied the uncompressed kernel image to /boot.
Remember you ran `make bzImage`?
That file (/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/bzImage) is the compressed
kernel image.
Eric
------------------------------
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera
Subject: Re: vmlinuz too big?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:43:58 +0200
In comp.os.linux.setup Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does it mean when lilo gives a Fatal: Kernel /boot/vmlinuz is too
> big? It's only 1.5 Megs - what is the physical size limit on a
Only! It should be about 500K, max!
> kernel????
The same size as a PCs real memory, more or less, since it has to
fit here before it can start being uncompressed. About 640KB.
If you don't like that, use bzImage instead. It does the decompression
bit by bit. But you still should be aiming at about 1MB max!
> (Trying to install Caldera on /dev/hda1 with 64Mb RAM, 2.0GB disk
Well, learn the meaning of the word "kernel module".
Peter
------------------------------
From: "Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kernel panic w/ kernel 2.4.2-1 -> VFS:Unable to mounth root fs on 03:44
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 13:14:20 +0200
> VFS: Cannot open root device "344" or "03:44"
This is not hdb4
(An I doubt this is changed in 2.4 kernels)
> Please append a correct "root=" boot option
So do this.
(at the lilo prompt, you enter "linux root=XXX")
either try the root=/dev/hdb4 option, or if that still fails
the root=03:68 option should work.
> Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:44
>
> --- Here is my /etc/lilo.conf:
> boot=/dev/hdb4
> root=/dev/hdb4
> install=/boot/boot.b
> map=/boot/map
> vga=normal
> delay=20
>
> image=/vmlinuz
> label=Linux
> read-only
>
> image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.18pre21
> label=2.2.18
> read-only
Did you run `/sbin/lilo -v` with this lilo.conf?
Eric
------------------------------
From: Sangohn Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.debian.user
Subject: [2.4.3]: Problems with new aic7xxx driver
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 13:26:06 +0200
Hello!
In 2.4.3 there is a new driver for the aic7xxx Adaptec scsi chips.
While upgrading from 2.4.2, this new driver was used automatically (just
copied the old .config). But with it, my scsi cdrom drive is not
recognized. With 2.4.2 and prior it is.
Is the driver still buggy or have I missed something?
TIA
P.S. Please mail me a copy of your answer. I can�t read news at home for
now.
------------------------------
From: shane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Micron Netframe MV 5000 with AMI Megaraid problems
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:33:48 GMT
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 01:26:27 GMT, "TheMartian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Apart from RH7 being a dog of a OS, the problem is the megaraid driver,
>its broken big time, still not fixed in the official 2.4.2 kernel release.
>A patch has been available from 2.4 ac7, works well with me, with my
>MegaRaid 438. Also looked at the driver on the megatrends.com web site,
>also broken.
>
>I have patched driver files that work well for me, want me to email them?
>
>David
>
>Sydney, Australia.
Yes, please send it to me! Without the driver working the box is
just sitting. The only drives in it are in that raid array, so w/o
a working megaraid.o I cannot use the machine.
Thanks,
Shane
>
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "shane"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to install Redhat 7 onto a Micron Netframe MV 5000. It has an
>> AMI Megaraid card in it. During the install, it tries to insmod
>> megaraid.o, but shows the following:
>>
>> found suggestion of megaraid
>> found eepro100
>> found NCR53c8xx
>> going to insmod megaraid.o (path is null)
>>
>> /tmp/megaraid.o: init_module: %M
>> Hint: The error can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including
>> invalid IO or IRQ parameters.
>>
>> Then this throws the installer because it cannot find any valid devices
>> to install onto, and the installer reboots the computer.
>>
>> On bootup, the megaraid card shows:
>>
>> Megaraid disk array adaptor bios version 1.07 Aug 08, 1997 Copyright (C)
>> American Megatrends Inc. Host Adaptor-1 Firmware version TN0F DRAM
>> SIZE=32mb Battery module is present on adaptor 1 logical drive found on
>> host adaptor
>>
>> When I hit ^M to go into the AMI megaraid bios, it shows
>>
>> Megaraid conf utility ver 1.01 July 10,1997
>>
>> On the card I found "IMMD80100209"
>>
>> If I hit ^altF4 during the install I see:
>>
>> megaraid:v1.09 (August 7, 2000)
>> <6> raid0 personality registered
>> <6> raid1 personality registered
>> <6> raid5 personality registered
>>
>> The machine is a Dual PII300 with 400LX chipset. On boot it shows
>> Phoenix BIOS 4.0 Release 6.0 MB440LX Bios Release 6.0 The machine
>> originally had NT4 on it. When NT4 was on it it showed:
>>
>> american megatrends 960RX RAID Adaptor NT4 driver: mraidrx.sys
>> interrupt: 9
>> memory range: FC9000000-FCFFFFFFFF
>>
>> I've looked at micronpc.com's website, and found the server:
>>
>> http://support.micronpc.com/apps/srvrhub.asp?Hub=MV5000&Include=
>>
>> So as best as I can tell, the card is equivalent to a Mylex DAC960 or
>> possibly a "MegaRAID RPX Module "
>>
>> I've sent mail to tech support @micronpc.com to see if they could point
>> me to the card's correct modelname (to match to the ones listed at
>> http://www.ami.com/support/product.cfm ). I haven't heard back from
>> them. Email to AMI said "match your card to the products list". Yeah, I
>> tried that before I email them...
>>
>>
>> Does anyone use this model of Micron or this card with Linux? 2.2.x or
>> 2.4 would work. If so, what driver are you using and where did you get
>> it?
>>
>> I've went through deja (now google), I found a lot of mentions of
>> Megaraid, and the kernel, and the kernel archives, but nothing that I
>> seemed to be able to use.
>>
>> I looked at /usr/src/linux/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c (2.4.2) and it lists:
>> MegaRAID 418, 428, 438, 466, 762, 467 and 490.
>>
>> Maybe this card is not supported by the megaraid driver?
>>
>>
>> Any help appreciated...
>>
>> Shane
>>
>>
>>
--
Biking in Ohio:
http://mtb.lottadot.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rpm -- 'corrupt header'
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:01:37 GMT
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 04/12/01
at 02:32 AM, "ne..." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>Hello!
>>
>>Any recovery from this?
>>
>>Big file downloaded over metered telephone connection, for naught. Wonder
>>if there's some way to repair or reconstruct this kind of corruption, some
>>tool for maintaining rpm's?
>cpio?
'cpio'? sorry, I don't understand.
when I run 'rpm2cpio' I get 'error reading header from package' which is
what prompted me to write this message in the first place. (I wasn't being
clear enough.)
what are you suggesting?
f.
===========================================================
Felmon John Davis
Union College / Schenectady, NY
os/2 - ma kauft koi katz em sack
===========================================================
------------------------------
From: "Marcel Rijnen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Newbie:recieving mail with linux
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 14:29:56 +0200
Hello,
I've here a linux system with procmail and when i send a mail with pine
locally to myself or another user the mail will be recieved correctly. But
when i send it from the internet it doesn't get to the system.
the system is connected to the internet, and i can ping it external and it
can be reached by domainname but is a sub domainname like bla.zooi.com. This
is because another mailserver is at mail.zooi.com (WINNT).
I just want that the systems recieves messages from the internet.
Many tnx...
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frederic Faure)
Subject: qmail: Adding disclaimer to Internet-bound emails?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:44:10 GMT
Hi,
I've looked at all the FAQs on qmail along with archives at Deja, but
I still cannot find how to add a disclaimer to any e-mail bound for
the Net, ie. I don't want it added to internal e-mails.
Any idea?
Thx
FF.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with dual boot
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:39:06 GMT
Hi all,
Sorry if I sound like a newbie. I had a windoze98 on my home PC with
4 partitions(C,D,E,F) and I wanted to install SuSE 7.1
SO, I deleted the F: drive(which was empty) using windows fdisk and
installed SuSE 7.1 from CD. Everything went off fine, I put LILO on MBR
and the next time I went to SuSE, after a few minutes the system crashed
and I found that my motherboard and CPU had to be replaced.
Now, after changing the motherboard and CPU, I have reinstalled SuSE
on the same partition but this time, I have put LILO on a floppy.
Iam afraid to put LILO on MBR but it is a pain booting from floppy.
Any suggestions?
THanks in advance,
Anirudh
--
Sent by anirudh from netcontinuum subpart from com
This is a spam protected message. Please answer with reference header.
Posted via http://www.usenet-replayer.com/cgi/content/new
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem with dual boot
Date: 12 Apr 2001 13:21:27 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> installed SuSE 7.1 from CD. Everything went off fine, I put LILO on MBR
> and the next time I went to SuSE, after a few minutes the system crashed
> and I found that my motherboard and CPU had to be replaced.
Well, I don't think you can blame LILO for this...
Davide
------------------------------
From: "JohnP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: need help installing linux
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 21:36:31 +0800
I can sympathize with your problems, I have just, today, succeeded in
getting Caldera OpenLinux to boot up and work. It took me a week of hair
tearing frustration but I finally found that the problem was making
partitions for Linux and Linux swap higher on the hard disk than the 1024
cylinder limit. Partition Magic shows the limit as a small black triangle on
the disc map. Make sure your Linux is set below that mark. Using Boot magic
is quite easy once everything is installed, just follow the instructions.
After booting up I found the system very daunting and not as pretty as
Windows and I still have to find out how to get my sound card and printer to
work as well as the CD burner etc. I may give it all up and go back to
surfing the web.
------------------------------
From: Wayne Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Suppressing Redhat bootup output
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 10:34:50 -0400
I once looked into where these messages came from. Turns out there
is a single file that each RC script runs to load some "shell
functions" such as "daemon" that in turn start a service and produce
the [OK] message output. (This was on SusE and Red Hat I believe,
but I could be mistaken it was a while ago that I looked.) So it
seems to me you have one shell script file to edit for this change.
look at the top of any of the rc scripts in .../init.d for a line
such as:
. functions
and then edit the file "functions" (it may not be called "functions").
You could for example send these messages to a file.
Other possibilities include switching the virtual console early.
The messages may be then sent to a single virtual console that
the users don't see by default. I don't know how to do this or
even if it is possible to do this early enough in the boot
sequence to be of use to you.
Another possibility is displaying a splash screen during boot up.
I think there is software for this, I have seen systems that
have such a screen, but I don't know where to get the software.
Hope this helps!
-Wayne Pollock
Paul Haley wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm running Redhat 6.2 and would like to suppress the output on bootup, such
> as "Loading cron..... [OK]", etc. All I want is to have lilo say "loading
> linux" and then give me a login prompt, though of course I still want all
> the programs/processes to run, I just don't want them to output to the
> screen. I checked out the init scripts and nothing jumped out at me.
>
> Can somebody help?
>
> Regards,
> Paul
------------------------------
From: Frank E Harrell Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ls and ps quit working except under root
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:41:03 -0400
I just fixed a few problems with my RedHat 7.0 setup such
as the hostname, fstab, and which network services are started at
boot time. Now I find that when logged in as user, neither
ls nor ps print anything. They work fine under root.
I have not changed file or directory permissions, aliases,
or the ls or ps executables. Thanks in advance to anyone
who can clear up the mystery. -Frank
--
Frank E Harrell Jr Prof. of Biostatistics & Statistics
Div. of Biostatistics & Epidem. Dept. of Health Evaluation Sciences
U. Virginia School of Medicine http://hesweb1.med.virginia.edu/biostat
------------------------------
From: "roshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HELP - /dev/fd0 has wrong major or minor number
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 10:52:10 -0400
After upgrading my kernel to 2.4.1 and pcmcia-cs to
3.1.25, my floppy is not initializing and when I try to mount
it I get an error message stating /dev/fd0 has wrong major or
minor number. I know the major number is 2 from major.h file
but I just don't know how to move forward from here.....
When I configured my kernel, I *DID* configure for floppy
support (auto).
Can't find a way to debug this..... where should I look?
Any words of wisdom???
BTW...I'm on Red Hat 7
------------------------------
From: Mathieu Brabant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Monitor a task
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:30:04 -0000
The command 'pidof ProcessName' will give you the process ID of the
process you specify. You can use this in a cron job/shell script,
depending on what actions you want taken when the process is dead.
M@
ky_chiang wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I hope to design a daem to monitor a task and recognize if the task
> is alive.
> How to do via format linux commands, system messages( ex./proc) and so
> on?
> Regards,
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: "Dominique Schuppli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How do I get rid of Red Hat 7's graphical LILO extension?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:55:54 +0200
RSJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:Ya5B6.4583$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> No just leave your computer turned on and logged in.
>
> Robert
Good idea! But the computer's fan's noisy and I couldn't go to sleep ;-)
Maybe I should move it to a far-away cave.
dom
------------------------------
From: Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How do I get rid of Red Hat 7's graphical LILO extension?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:03:00 -0500
Dominique Schuppli wrote:
> Do I have to uninstall LILO and reinstall another version to get rid of
> Red Hat 7's graphical boot loader? I'm getting tired of watching my
> monitor blank and change video mode all the time...
Edit /etc/lilo.conf and remove the line that says
message=/boot/message
and re-run lilo. You'll be back to the text-only version.
-- Rex
------------------------------
From: "DAVID FITZGERALD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Low X Window Resolution...........HELP!!!
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:09:20 GMT
Hi all,
I've just installed Linux Red Hat v6.2 for the first time on a second
computer for school purposes.
The installation seemed to be a success, except for the fact that the X
Window resolution is extrememly low. I selected 8-bit 1024x768 during the
set-up process, but it looks more like 600x480 or lower. I also selected the
option to have X load on start up.
My question is:
Can I change the screen resolution somewhere within the X Window? If not,
what would be the easiest way to do this?
I'm guessing this must be a common problem, so I apologize if I am asking a
question that has already been aked & answered a million times. I've been a
DOS & Windows user since the beginning, and this Linux OS is a whole new
world for me. The school book I have (A guide to Unix using Linux) does not
seem to cover this problem.
Thanks in advance,
Dave Fitzgerald
FYI - I have an Intel 740 AGP video card, which was not listed.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:18:17 -0700
From: David Harnsberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: unrecognized cdrom
Hello,
I'm just getting into this Linux thing. I have redhat 6.2 all up and
running on my machine and in KDE when I pull up a terminal and try to
mount my cdrom drive with a cd in it, I get the message:
mount: No medium found
but there is a medium (cd) in the drive, so I don't know what to do.
Can anybody help me solve this problem?
thanks a lot,
Dave
------------------------------
From: Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Red Hat system start up
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:30:05 -0000
Craig Van Tassle wrote:
>
> I am trying to figure out how to change the way my system starts up so i
> can close down several services that I don't want to be open (netbios
> for one) I was wondering if any one know a t-phile that explains the RH
> start-up system in detail. the only ones that I found said it uses
> scripts. Well what do i need to do to modify those scripts to kill the
> things that I don't want open
>
> Thanks
> Craig
>
Craig,
you might also consider using linuxconf. it's a very powerful
configuration tool. it can be run from the command prompt (just type
linuxconf) or from within the GUI.
goto control, control panel, control service activity.
it's pretty self explanatory from there. but... BE CAREFUL. you don't
want to just start turning off services. some are required for proper
operation.
Gerard.
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:46:01 -0700
From: David Harnsberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unrecognized cdrom
Hello,
I'm just getting into this Linux thing. I have redhat 6.2 all up and
running on my machine and in KDE when I pull up a terminal and try to
mount my cdrom drive with a cd in it, I get the message:
mount: No medium found
but there is a medium (cd) in the drive, so I don't know what to do.
Can anybody help me solve this problem?
thanks a lot,
Dave
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Crossposted-To: linux.dev.sound
Subject: Re: Yamaha PCI (Dell m/b) and 2.4
Date: 12 Apr 2001 19:05:28 GMT
In article <A06B6.34423$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jonas Due Vesterheden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Okay I finally found some info on it. All I needed was to insert these lines
| into /etc/modules.conf:
|
| alias char-major-116 snd
| alias snd-card-0 ymfpci
| alias sound-slot-0 snd-card-0
|
| And then everything worked fine, except I had to chmod some devices
| (/dev/dsp, /dev/mixer, /dev/midi and so on) to give other users than root
| access to the sound.
|
| I don't know if this will help you, but try it...
Well, there are no devices with that major, and the kernel modules are
OSS rather than ALSA, so I'm not sure what issues I might have there. I
tried using char-major-14, which is what /dev/sndstat uses, and it all
loaded fine but didn't in any way... work.
Thanks for the tips though, once I get this working or give up and turn
it off and put in a real sound card I will play with ALSA. But right now
I'd like to use the drivers which come with the stock kernel. Well,
2.4.3-ac3, as stock as that might be.
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
At LinuxExpo Sun was showing Linux applications running on Solaris.
They don't get it, the arrow points the other way. There's a reason why
there's no SolarisExpo, Solaris is a tool; Linux is a philosophy, a
religion, a way of life, and only incidentally an operating system.
------------------------------
From: tech2kjason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Low X Window Resolution...........HELP!!!
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 14:07:23 -0500
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:09:20 GMT, "DAVID FITZGERALD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've just installed Linux Red Hat v6.2 for the first time on a second
>computer for school purposes.
>
>The installation seemed to be a success, except for the fact that the X
>Window resolution is extrememly low. I selected 8-bit 1024x768 during the
>set-up process, but it looks more like 600x480 or lower. I also selected the
>option to have X load on start up.
>
>My question is:
>
>Can I change the screen resolution somewhere within the X Window? If not,
>what would be the easiest way to do this?
>
Normally, if things went well, you could use "CTRL+ALT++" the control+alt+the
plus key, to rotate between the installed resolutions.
>I'm guessing this must be a common problem, so I apologize if I am asking a
>question that has already been aked & answered a million times. I've been a
>DOS & Windows user since the beginning, and this Linux OS is a whole new
>world for me. The school book I have (A guide to Unix using Linux) does not
>seem to cover this problem.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>Dave Fitzgerald
>
>FYI - I have an Intel 740 AGP video card, which was not listed.
>
This might be a problem... The installation defaulted to a standard vga
X-server... Check the XFree86.org website to see there is an updated server that
supports this video card.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.setup.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************
