On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > There's unfortunately no completely non-disruptive way to manage this > shift (hence why it's taking so long), but we think this is a > reasonable approach that allows each distro to devise a migration plan > that makes sense for them and their userbase while still allow Python > end users to write readable cross-distro code that doesn't particular > care whether it's run under Python 2 or Python 3, and for open source > Python project maintainers to provide developer guidelines that are > entirely independent of particular distro's choices about default > Python runtimes. > > Before taking this proposal to python-dev, I'd turn the general > concept into an actual PR with specific proposed wording changes, but > I figured it made sense for us to seek some initial feedback here > before doing that.
Sounds good to me. (I'm not subbed to linux-sig, though perhaps I should be.) Did I get copied in on this for assistance with the PEP writing? In any case, I'm wholly in favour of the transition. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Linux-sig mailing list Linux-sig@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-sig
