Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 08:15:07 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Fri, 18 Dec 1998, David S. Miller wrote: > > I can prove this. The performance counters on the Ultra, unless > broken, support my claims completely. Uhh.. The performance counters may not be broken, but the Ultra SMP code _was_ broken. You resheduled all the time, didn't you? No, we don't anymore at all. That was a bug which was in there before I got SMP working at all again on sparc64 some time ago. So my performance analysis was done without this problem. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/ To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [PATCH] Scheduling problems wrt SMP Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Scheduling problems wrt SMP Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Scheduling problems wrt SMP MOLNAR Ingo
- Re: [PATCH] Scheduling problems wrt SMP Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Scheduling problems wrt SMP Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Scheduling problems wrt SMP MOLNAR Ingo
- Re: [PATCH] Scheduling problems wrt SMP Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Scheduling problems wrt SMP MOLNAR Ingo
- Re: [PATCH] Scheduling problems wrt SMP David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Scheduling problems wrt SMP Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Scheduling problems wrt SMP David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Scheduling problems wrt SMP MOLNAR Ingo
- Re: [PATCH] Scheduling problems wrt SMP David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Scheduling problems wrt SMP Rik van Riel
