I find a debate like this all quite interesting. Regardless who tells me
what, or who publishes what, the fact is when I use Linux on my desktop
and enterprise servers it always runs faster, more stable and costs less
than the Windows counterparts.
Michael.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Pirih [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 15 April 1999 10:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NT vs Linux --- MINDCRAFT LIED ABOUT THE NEWSGROUP POSTINGS
At 02:01 PM 04/14/1999 PDT, Anatolii Belomestnov wrote:
>Mindcraft lied about posting requests for help to the newsgroupd.
...
>When doing a powersearch on dejanews.com on "mindcraft (AND) linux"
>we get multiple articles posted starting and post 04/14/99 (when
>the report is publishes), but nothing between 98/08/20 and 99/04/14,
Try searching for "linux smp apache performance". There's an
article posted on 1999/03/11 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] asking
about performance tuning that seems to describe exactly the
same system as used by Mindcraft (quad Xeon, 1GB, RedHat 5.2
with 2.2.2 kernel). There don't seem to be any replies.
If you care, do some benchmarks on your own performance-tuned
Linux SMP system and post them on slashdot. It'll be all over
the mainstream news in a few days. They love "controversy."
-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at
http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
