>
> I'd like to see this as configrable parameters for the kernel,
> not as a
> real hard limit. Several years ago some people agreed that 640
> kb RAM would
> be more than sufficient - more than anybody would ever need to
> have. We all
> know how crippled the system was, that arose from this dumb
> assumption, don't we?
>
his name was Bill Gates, and he that is one of his most famous
quotes, the same cold be said about hte 1023 cylinder limit that
haunts us today....
> The systems keep getting faster and a limit which is today
> high up in the
> sky is tomorrow a bottleneck. Keep the hard limits away!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Herbert
>
>
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> In theory there's no difference between theory and practice,
> but in practice...
>
> -
> Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at
> http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/
> To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
