> It doesn't appear that way to me. (But of course, I have very little experience
>with the
> internals of linux, and may be way off-base ;-) ).
The implementation is wrong thetheory is right. But then he said it was
his first kernel
> It seems like this would be more accurate, the comments in the code state that it
> is accurate to 100 ppm.
The bogomips are computed from the real cpu tsc nowdays so I deal fir this
> One final comment: Can we have a silent success path. ie don't include
> the following:
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "CPUs have the same speed, enabling TSC\n");
Seems sensible
> Maybe in the 2.5 stream, some type of debug_level could be passed to the kernel at
>boot
Actually I thought it already was there. Never looked hard.
-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/dmentre/smp-howto/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
