Hi Daniel, On 09/19/2016 11:13 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 09/19/2016 06:21 PM, Daniel Mentz wrote: >> > Hi Vineet, >> > >> > Thank you for your patches. I applied them, and verified that >> > unwinding works with code that is compiled into the kernel image as >> > well as kernel modules. >> > I confirmed that the .eh_frame section is present and that the >> > .debug_frame section is absent. I also verified that the file size of >> > the .ko files are small enough for our embedded platform and that >> > unnecessary sections like .debug_info, .debug_line, .debug_str etc. >> > are also absent. >> > Is there anything else you want me to test? >> > Thanks >> > Daniel > Nope - that is it. Just wanted to make sure it is "field" tested :-) > > Thx, > -Vineet
FYI - I've pushed some more changes to unwinding department so that we get call-traces for memset/memcpy et al. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vgupta/arc.git #for-next -Vineet _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
