On 10/17/2016 10:19 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> A single character (line break) should be put into a sequence.
>>> Thus use the corresponding function "seq_putc".
>> Perhaps reword the changelog to say that seqc_putc is more efficient than
>> seqc_printf to output a single char.
>> I mean _printf is not wrong but not as efficient ?
> I came along source files for a few other software modules with similar
> change possibilities.
> Unfortunately, the corresponding developers are not convinced yet
> to replace a call of the function "seq_printf" at the end by
> a "seq_putc" because of software efficiency reasons.
I was ambivalent so far - but not anymore :-)
what is the objection - can you point me to a few links where people don't think
this is not a good idea.
> Do you find this update suggestion acceptable to some degree
> for the function "setup"?
linux-snps-arc mailing list