On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:29 PM David Laight <david.lai...@aculab.com> wrote:
> From: Alexey Brodkin
> > Sent: 09 July 2018 13:48
> > Atomic instructions require data they operate on to be aligned
> > according to data size. I.e. 32-bit atomic values must be 32-bit
> > aligned while 64-bit values must be 64-bit aligned.
> >
> > Otherwise even if CPU may handle not-aligend normal data access,
> > still atomic instructions fail and typically raise an exception
> > leaving us dead in the water.
> ...
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/atomic64.h b/include/asm-generic/atomic64.h
> > index 8d28eb010d0d..b94b749b5952 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/atomic64.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/atomic64.h
> > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
> > #define _ASM_GENERIC_ATOMIC64_H
> >
> > typedef struct {
> > - long long counter;
> > + u64 __aligned(8) counter;
> > } atomic64_t;
>
> Apart from the fact that this changes the value from signed to unsigned
> should most of the architectures be using this generic definition?
64-bit architectures use the one from include/linux/types.h instead.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
