On 12/18/18 2:59 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: >> I deliberately kept them out to call out the fixes, sometimes these help >> new ports which stumble into similar issues. And also ~2 years worth of >> work gets squashed into a single blob is a shame :-) > > Postings of a new port should generally post each new file in the form in > which it is intended to be committed (and, thus, the form in which it > should be reviewed); you should never post a known-buggy version and a > subsequent fix to the bug; that wastes reviewers' time. (The actual > commit of the port should be a single commit with everything, modulo > possible separate earlier commits for changes to architecture-independent > files, as the port isn't useful with only a subset of the new files > added.
Ok I can certainly squash them in next version. Thx, -Vineet _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
