On Fri 21-12-18 09:55:34, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 12/21/18 5:04 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > Yes, the fix might be more involved but I would much rather prefer a > > correct code which builds on solid assumptions. > > Right so the first step is reverting the disabled semantics for ARC and do > some > heavy testing to make sure any fallouts are addressed etc. And if that works, > then > propagate this change to core itself. Low risk strategy IMO - agree ?
Yeah, I would simply remove the preempt_disable and see what falls out. smp_processor_id could be converted to the raw version etc... -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
