On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 09:13, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:07 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> > wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:53 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <k...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > The ioread8/16/32() and others have inconsistent interface among the > > > architectures: some taking address as const, some not. > > > > > > It seems there is nothing really stopping all of them to take > > > pointer to const. > > > > Shouldn't all of them take const volatile __iomem pointers? > > It seems the "volatile" is missing from all but the implementations in > > include/asm-generic/io.h. > > As my "volatile" comment applies to iowrite*(), too, probably that should be > done in a separate patch. > > Hence with patches 1-5 squashed, and for patches 11-13: > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be>
I'll add to this one also changes to ioreadX_rep() and add another patch for volatile for reads and writes. I guess your review will be appreciated once more because of ioreadX_rep() Thanks, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
