On Tue, Dec 30, 2025, at 08:10, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>
> /* entries in ARCH_DLINFO: */
> -#if defined(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) || !defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
> +#if defined(__KERNEL__) && (defined(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) ||
> !defined(CONFIG_X86_64))
> # define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH 3
> #else /* else it's non-compat x86-64 */
> # define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH 2
While this patch clearly keeps the current behavior, I think it's
wrong, and 32-bit userspace should see a '3' instead of '2' here.
It can probably just be '3' unconditionally, or we can
make it more complex and have a userspace definition based
on __x86_64__ being defined.
I also wonder if there is a problem with the third
x86-64 entry being zero rather than AT_IGNORE. I see that
some architectures do it like this, to keep the number constant
even if some entries are missing:
if (likely(signal_minsigstksz)) \
NEW_AUX_ENT(AT_MINSIGSTKSZ, signal_minsigstksz); \
else \
NEW_AUX_ENT(AT_IGNORE, 0); \
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
