> A 25% disk i/o decrease is very serious. Lets get some serious feedback > from people running internet and database servers before we blow off > the server users in order to compete with BEOS. For most people its unacceptable in that form, but nobody has yet sat down and tuned the tuned code to get the disk performance all back. I don't think the two are exclusive. We also have tons of time. Its not a 2.2. candidate
- Low-latency patches working GREAT (<2.9ms audio latenc... Benno Senoner
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREAT (<2.9... yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREAT (<... Alan Cox
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREAT ... yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GR... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches worki... yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches w... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patch... yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patch... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patch... yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patch... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patch... yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patch... Andrea Arcangeli
