Good catch. Do you find it by having some some code which triggers
this?
Chris
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 08:44:35PM +0000, James Westby wrote:
> Fix a mistake in same_cast_type where the second test became a no-op as it
> compared a value to itself, rather than to the second operand.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> evaluate.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
> index ca49ed0..e3aa2fe 100644
> --- a/evaluate.c
> +++ b/evaluate.c
> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ left:
>
> static int same_cast_type(struct symbol *orig, struct symbol *new)
> {
> - return orig->bit_size == new->bit_size && orig->bit_offset ==
> orig->bit_offset;
> + return orig->bit_size == new->bit_size && orig->bit_offset ==
> new->bit_offset;
> }
>
> static struct symbol *base_type(struct symbol *node, unsigned long *modp,
> unsigned long *asp)
> --
> 1.4.4.2
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
