On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 04:23:57AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > I've followed all the patches on linux-sparse, and I have tested several of > them in local git; I just haven't pushed out new bits. I particularly look
Great to know you are back. I can resend my stack of patches now :-) > forward to integrating your NULL pointer checking code, and I think I can I haven't get much feed back of the new checking code yet. I will refresh my patch as well. Without cross function/file checking, the interrupt checking generates way too many false positives. I am working on the cross file checking right now. > adapt some of the dataflow analysis code for lock context checking as well. I > also know at least one likely customer for the smarter Sparse-based ctags, and > I plan to look into generating cscope information as well (sparscope). Expect > bits soon. Sparscope will be interesting. Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
