Christopher Li wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:54:47AM -0800, Christopher Li wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:24:09AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> Actually, it's often better to just explicitly make "ctype" be >>> "&bad_ctype" instead. >>> >>> It's nice if a NULL type means "type has not been evaluated yet", and then >>> using "&bad_ctype" to mean "type evaluated to crap". >> Good idea. Some of the code already doing that. I am making it as a separate >> patch because touch a lot of code. > > This is very messy. The current evaluate_* functions are assuming NULL means > for > "some error happen in this expression, I can't get the ctype". It is all over > the > place.
In that case, I will go ahead and apply your patch to eliminate the segfault, and I can merge a new patch that uses &bad_ctype later. - Josh Triplett
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
