On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 04:38:49PM +0100, Derek M Jones wrote: > Al, > > >4) > >gcc is kinda-sorta tolerant to mixing pointers to signed and unsigned, > >unless you explicitly ask to be strict. However, it's nowhere near > >as lenient as sparse.
> Having sparse complain about > constructs that gcc is rather lax about means that those involved in > kernel development might fix the underlying problem in their code. Compare the last two sentences... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
