Hi Geert,

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 09:57:38AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Baruch Siach <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > +    master->transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_device 
> >> > *spi,
> >> > +                        struct spi_transfer *transfer)
> >> > +       The subsystem calls the driver to transfer a single transfer 
> >> > while
> >> > +       queuing transfers that arrive in the meantime. When the driver is
> >> > +       finished with this message, it must call
> >> > +       spi_finalize_current_transfer() so the subsystem can issue the 
> >> > next
> >> > +       transfer. This may sleep. Note: transfer_one and 
> >> > transfer_one_message
> >> > +       are mutually exclusive; when both are set, the generic subsystem 
> >> > does
> >> > +       not call your transfer_one callback.
> >>
> >> You still forgot the updates I made in
> >> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1401.2/02465.html
> >
> > AFAICS, your patch touches spi.h, not spi-summary. Am I missing something
> > here?
> 
> I think the description in spi-summary should be updated to match the
> changes to spi.h.

OK. Will do.

baruch

-- 
     http://baruch.siach.name/blog/                  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - [email protected] - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to