On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:55:33AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> > to be letting the transfer run in the background. Though I suppose that > > might make sense in some situations... > While I've been thinking about moving more code to the interrupt handler, > the current RSPI transfer_one() is indeed still synchronous, so the timeout > doesn't apply yet. OK, that's interesting. Actually one of the things that this refactoring into the core is driving at is that hopefully we'll be able to deploy some of the optimisation techniques like that in the core rather than having individual drivers open coding them - this should on average increase performance.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
