On Sunday, February 02, 2014 at 02:52:52 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

Hi, thanks for preparing this patch!

I have just a few very minor nitpicks, ignore if you please.

[...]
 
> +static int spi_map_buf(struct spi_master *master, struct device *dev,
> +                    struct sg_table *sgt, void *buf, size_t len,
> +                    enum dma_data_direction dir)
> +{
> +     const bool vmalloced_buf = is_vmalloc_addr(buf);
> +     const int desc_len = vmalloced_buf ? PAGE_SIZE : master->max_dma_len;

You might want to rename this to "sg_chunk_max_size" or something, "desc_len" 
doesn't make much sense here. The variable describes the maximum size of one 
single scatterlist element.

> +     const int sgs = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, desc_len);

Looking at this, the variables could generally use a more meaningful name. I 
think it'd be clearer to call this "num_sg_chunks" or so ?

> +     struct page *vm_page;
> +     void *sg_buf;
> +     size_t min;
> +     int i, ret;
> +
> +     ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, sgs, GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (ret != 0)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < sgs; i++) {
> +             min = min_t(size_t, len, desc_len);
> +
> +             if (vmalloced_buf) {
> +                     vm_page = vmalloc_to_page(buf);

Just curious, but shouldn't we check if buf != NULL right at the begining of 
this function?

[...]

> +static void spi_unmap_buf(struct spi_master *master, struct device *dev,
> +                       struct sg_table *sgt, enum dma_data_direction dir)
> +{
> +     if (sgt->orig_nents) {

I don't want to nag, but why not use if (!sgt->...) return; ? This would cut 
down one level of indent.

> +             dma_unmap_sg(dev, sgt->sgl, sgt->orig_nents, dir);
> +             sg_free_table(sgt);
> +     }
> +}
> +

[...]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to