On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:11:29PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> On Friday 11 April 2014, 17:22:23 wrote Mark Brown:

> > Converting to use the core transfer_one_message() would also help, we
> > could then return from the transfer function and have the core implement
> > the wait for the completion.

> Mh, this driver already uses that.
> > master->transfer_one_message = atmel_spi_transfer_one_message;

> Or did you mean transfer_one?

Yes, I mean the driver should use the core version of
transfer_one_message() rather than providing its own which in turn means
that it has to provide a transfer_one() function.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to