On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:55:42PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> > From: Mark Brown <[email protected]>

> > @@ -1162,6 +1161,7 @@ static int spi_master_initialize_queue(struct 
> > spi_master *master)
> >                 dev_err(&master->dev, "problem initializing queue\n");
> >                 goto err_init_queue;

> You can just "return ret;" here...

> >  err_start_queue:
> > -err_init_queue:
> >         spi_destroy_queue(master);
> > +err_init_queue:

> ... and kill the err_init_queue label.

Yeah, I know.  It's a stylistic thing - I tend to prefer to always use
labels if they're used at all in a function even if we could return
directly since it's more consistent.  Not that I'm 100% consistent about
that.

> Apart from that:
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

Thanks.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to