On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 09:01:50AM +0000, ker...@martin.sperl.org wrote: Looks like I did get these but they took a while to come through... odd.
> -static int bcm2835_spi_start_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, > - struct spi_transfer *tfr) > +static int bcm2835_spi_start_transfer( > + struct spi_device *spi, > + struct spi_transfer *tfr) Like Stephen says I'm not 100% sure what issues this is fixing but I have to say I find the overall result worse. It's possible the warning is something reasonable but without knowing what it is it's hard to say, I do like to see at least the first argument on the same line as the function name though.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
