On 15 June 2015 at 11:53, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:22:14PM +0200, Mathias Krause wrote: >> Constify the ACPI device ID array, it doesn't need to be writable at >> runtime. > > Applied, please do make an effort to CC relevant people working on the > code when contributing patches (I'm not seeing any of the people working > on the Intel platforms here and I'm at a bit of a loss why Rafael and > Len are in the CCs).
I used the list of people that are mentioned in the MAINTAINERS file: PXA2xx/PXA3xx SUPPORT M: Daniel Mack <[email protected]> M: Haojian Zhuang <[email protected]> M: Robert Jarzmik <[email protected]> ... F: drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx* Was that wrong? Who else should I've send the patch to? Maybe they should be added to the MAINTAINERS file? Rafael and Len are on Cc because of [1] -- an effort to constify all users of struct acpi_device_id. They're on Cc because of the ACPI relation. I hope that clears it up. I was uncertain how to group those changes but tried to split them up per-system. So you're seeing only the patches where you are mentioned as a maintainer. I thought it would be less noise this way for the non-ACPI related patches. It's a simple patch, after all. [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg58593.html Regards, Mathias -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
