From: Martin Sperl <ker...@martin.sperl.org>

Fixes the reported printk format issues reported by kbuild-test-robot.

Signed-off-by: Martin Sperl <ker...@martin.sperl.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

I hope I got them right (no warnings on my system).
Is there a way to apply the same warning checks as kbuild-test-robot for
printk?

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c b/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
index facef7a..7f497ac 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static void spi_test_print_hex_dump(char *pre, const void 
*ptr, size_t len)
                       DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1,
                       ptr, 512, 0);
        /* print tail */
-       pr_info("%s truncated - continuing at offset %04x\n",
+       pr_info("%s truncated - continuing at offset %04zx\n",
                pre, len - 512);
        print_hex_dump(KERN_INFO, pre,
                       DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1,
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static int spi_test_check_loopback_result(struct spi_device 
*spi,
 
 mismatch_error:
        dev_err(&spi->dev,
-               "loopback strangeness - transfer missmatch on byte %04x - 
expected 0x%02x, but got 0x%02x\n",
+               "loopback strangeness - transfer missmatch on byte %04zx - 
expected 0x%02x, but got 0x%02x\n",
                i, txb, rxb);
 
        return -EINVAL;
@@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ static int spi_test_run_iter(struct spi_device *spi,
                dev_info(&spi->dev, "Running test %s\n", test.description);
        } else {
                dev_info(&spi->dev,
-                        "  with iteration values: len = %i, tx_off = %i, 
rx_off = %i\n",
+                        "  with iteration values: len = %zu, tx_off = %zu, 
rx_off = %zu\n",
                         len, tx_off, rx_off);
        }
 
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to