On Mar 27, 2006, at 8:34 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:

Kevin,

Some gcc compilers (and it looks like you're using an older one), don't
detect regparm attribute mismatches in pointers when regparms is pass
as a option to the compiler, that is:

  int (*foo)(int) __attribute__((regparm,0));

  int bar(int dummy) {
          return (dummy);
  }

  foo = &bar;  /* should generate an error -regparm=3, but doesn't */

therefore, even though qinit is defined in include/sys/LiS/queue.h as:

  typedef struct qinit {
  #if defined(USE_VOID_PUT_PROC)
          void _RP (*qi_putp) (queue_t *, mblk_t *);    /* put procedure */
          void _RP (*qi_srvp) (queue_t *);      /* service procedure */
  #else
          int _RP (*qi_putp) (queue_t *, mblk_t *);     /* put procedure */
          int _RP (*qi_srvp) (queue_t *);       /* service procedure */
  #endif
          int _RP (*qi_qopen) (queue_t *, dev_t *, int, int, cred_t *);
int _RP (*qi_qclose) (queue_t *, int, cred_t *); /* close procedure */
          int _RP (*qi_qadmin) (void);  /* debugging */
struct lis_module_info *qi_minfo; /* module information structure */
          struct module_stat *qi_mstat; /* module statistics structure */
  } qinit_t;

Where _RP is __attribute__((regparm,0)) on regparm supporting architectures,
you can do this:

int foo_open(queue_t *q, dev_t *devp, int oflag, int sflag, cred_t *crp) {
        ...
        return (0);
  }

  int foo_close(queue_t *q, int oflag, cred_t *crp) {
        ...
        return (0);
  }

  struct qinit foo_rinit = {
      ...
      .qi_qopen = &foo_open,
      .qi_qclose = &foo_close,
      ...
  };

and when compiled with -regparms=3, older gcc3 compilers will not warn of the
mismatch.

If you do, however,

int _RP foo_open(queue_t *q, dev_t *devp, int oflag, int sflag, cred_t *crp) {
        ...
        return (0);
  }

  int _RP foo_close(queue_t *q, int oflag, cred_t *crp) {
        ...
        return (0);
  }

There is no mismatch and no problem.  So, try that.

For Linux Fast-STREAMS, the equivalent is 'streamscall', so

int streamscall foo_open(queue_t *q, dev_t *devp, int oflag, int sflag, cred_t *crp) {
        ...
        return (0);
  }

  int streamscall foo_close(queue_t *q, int oflag, cred_t *crp) {
        ...
        return (0);
  }

Under Linux Fast-STREAMS, streamscall is __attribute__((regparm,3)) on
supporting architectures, so if you forget the streamscall you will only
encounter problems on non-regparms kernels (for architectures support
regparms). The result is of course faster than LiS on ia32 architectures.

Hope that helps.

BTW, the current Linux Fast-STREAMS works *way* better than LiS.

--brian


On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Kevin K wrote:

Has anyone else noticed a problem with the Redhat Kernel compiled
with the default register parameters?

I'm looking at porting a legacy set of modules written for LiS 2.12
and the 2.4.18 kernel to the Red Hat 2.6.9-34 kernel.

The initial problem I encountered was that the open routine in the
module was getting garbage in it's parameter.  I enabled debug
output, and it showed that, just before it called my routine, it had
the right parameters.

Finally, I ended up recompiling the kernel again with regparms turned
off, and recompiled LiS correctly.  I required a modification to the
Makefile, since the configure script didn't retrieve the
configuration options correctly, then it finally started to work.

Note, I haven't tried the most recent version of Fast Streams yet.  I
couldn't get the streams module to load successfully in the January
version.  Unfortunately, I didn't save any of the error output.  I
may give it another try in the not to distant future, if only because
if it works, it will save a considerable amount of memory.  It is
hard to believe how much memory the current version of streams is
taking up :)
_______________________________________________
Linux-streams mailing list
[email protected]
http://gsyc.escet.urjc.es/mailman/listinfo/linux-streams


I'll take a look at that. I didn't think about definition of the actual open routine, and since it is over 5 years old, it isn't aware of any of the newer compiler issues. But after 5 years of using gcc 2.96, 3.4.5 seems new to me :)

Obviously, I'm hopeful that any issues in our code can be cleaned up enough that it will support both versions. On some of our hardware, the meg that LiS is using is a significant portion of a 32MB computer, especially when we already hit the swap file pretty hard on RHEL 2.1.

Thanks for the pointer.

Kevin
_______________________________________________
Linux-streams mailing list
[email protected]
http://gsyc.escet.urjc.es/mailman/listinfo/linux-streams

Reply via email to