Hi, On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 01:40:14PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/16/2013 11:40 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >Hi Hans, > > > >On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 07:55:22PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>The correct value for selecting the mmc0 function on port F pins is 2 not 4, > >>as per the data-sheet: > >>http://dl.linux-sunxi.org/A13/A13%20Datasheet%20-%20v1.12%20%282012-03-29%29.pdf > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> > > > >Still not sent to either LAKML or the pinctrl maintainer... > > Heh, I'm clearly still a bit new to the exact rules for ARM patch submission, > since you are the author of the pinctrl-sunxi driver I thought I should send > the patch to you. > > So in general I should send the patch to the subsys maintainer for which the > patch is, CC-ing: the driver author, subsys-list (if any), and LAKML ?
As a general rule (not only ARM related), Cc whoever scripts/get_maintainer.pl returns, at least, and as long as ARM is involved somewhere, it's always good to CC LAKML. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
