The comment was claiming that we were masking all irqs, while the code actually
*un*masks all of them.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
index 3761bf1..749a355 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static int __init sun4i_of_init(struct device_node *node,
        writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_ENABLE_REG(1));
        writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_ENABLE_REG(2));
 
-       /* Mask all the interrupts */
+       /* Unmask all the interrupts, ENABLE_REG(x) is used for masking */
        writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_MASK_REG(0));
        writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_MASK_REG(1));
        writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_MASK_REG(2));
-- 
1.9.0

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to