Hi, On 05/09/2014 10:55 AM, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > > On 09/05/2014 10:43, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31-app4-evb1.dts | 8 +------- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31-app4-evb1.dts >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31-app4-evb1.dts >> index 270ab97..2bbf886 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31-app4-evb1.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31-app4-evb1.dts >> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ >> >> /dts-v1/; >> /include/ "sun6i-a31.dtsi" >> +/include/ "sunxi-common-regulators.dtsi" >> >> / { >> model = "Allwinner A31 APP4 EVB1 Evaluation Board"; >> @@ -49,15 +50,8 @@ >> }; >> >> reg_usb1_vbus: usb1-vbus { >> - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; >> - pinctrl-names = "default"; >> pinctrl-0 = <&usb1_vbus_pin_a>; >> - regulator-name = "usb1-vbus"; >> - regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>; >> - regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>; >> - enable-active-high; >> gpio = <&pio 7 27 0>; >> status = "okay"; >> }; > > I guess we could do the same for usb1_vbus_pin_a (keep the common > definition and change the allwinner,pins property).
Hmm, what we do with other boards when the pin does not match the default is change the node name to something baord specific, ie usb1_vbus_pin_app4_evb1 Which is why I did not remove the common bits from the pin, I did not notice you did not use a board specific name here. Regards, Hans -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
