On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Korneliusz Osmenda wrote: > --- > boards.cfg | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/boards.cfg b/boards.cfg > index cc9ba1a..fd53aa7 100644 > --- a/boards.cfg > +++ b/boards.cfg > @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ Active arm armv7 sunxi - > sunxi > Active arm armv7 sunxi - sunxi > INet97F-II sun4i:INET97F_II,SPL > > - > Active arm armv7 sunxi - sunxi > INet_K70HC sun7i:INET_K70HC,SPL > > - > Active arm armv7 sunxi - sunxi > Jesurun-Q5 > sun4i:JESURUN_Q5,SPL,SUNXI_EMAC,STATUSLED=244 > - > -Active arm armv7 sunxi - sunxi > K1001L1C sun7i:K1001L1C,SPL > > - > +Active arm armv7 sunxi - sunxi > k1001l1c sun7i:K1001L1C,SPL > > - > Active arm armv7 sunxi - sunxi > Linksprite_pcDuino3 > sun7i:LINKSPRITE_PCDUINO3,SPL,SUNXI_GMAC,FAST_MBUS > - > Active arm armv7 sunxi - sunxi > Marsboard_A10 > sun4i:MARSBOARD_A10,SPL,SUNXI_EMAC,NO_AXP > - > Active arm armv7 sunxi - sunxi > Marsboard_A20 > sun7i:MARSBOARD_A20,SPL,SUNXI_EMAC,NO_AXP > -
If you are doing this sort of change, please give this device a more proper name. Either Inet_K100c, which is the name of the board, or Inet_K100c-L1 which would be the unique combination of this board and the rest of the device. My feeling is that Inet_K100c is enough, until we actually prove that there is another device with this board out there. The latter is unlikely given the very high rate at which new devices and boards are produced, despite the fact that inet tries to market it differently. Finally, what nonsense is the bsp code doing that it breaks capitalization? Luc Verhaegen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
