On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:19:18PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > This patch also changes the GPIO bindings for R_PIO: > > > > gpios = <&r_pio B N flag>; > > > > Where B originally was the pinbank label (L or M) counted from A, > > with this patch it becomes (L or M) counted from its pinbank base (L). > > > > Thus > > > > gpios = <&r_pio 10 11 0>; /* PL11 */ > > > > becomes > > > > gpios = <&r_pio 0 11 0>; /* PL11 */ > > > > IMO this is correct, as the binding shows the bank offset and pin offset > > within the bank for the GPIO controller. But I'm worried it might be a > > bit confusing. > > I see you Acked this patch, but also in your reply to my cover letter, > you mentioned that you want absolute pin numbers matching the datasheets. > What about the GPIO DT bindings, as I explained above? > > Just double checking. Thanks.
I'd like it to have the absolute numbers in sysfs, but the relative one in the DT. But I guess it's already what's happening, right? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
