On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 04:04:43PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:02:22AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > Another option is to completely switch to AW<chip id>, which would mimic > > > what i did for unichrome. > > > > That would make a lot of sense. > > > > > A10 = AW1623 (sun4i) > > > A13/A10s = AW1625 (sun5i) > > > A31 = AW1633 (sun6i) > > > A20 = AW1651 (sun7i) > > > A23 = AW1650 (sun8i) > > > A80 = AW1635 (sun9i) > > > A33 = AW1667 (...) > > > > Wait, no, not *that* chip ID. I thought you meant to use A10 to refer > > to the A10 SoC, and A33 to refer to the A33 SoC. Or would that be > > simply too obvious? > > Where do you stick A10s, which is an A13 in another package. > > Luc Verhaegen.
It has some merit though, as Allwinner cannot go and remove the printing on chips which already shipped. If their recent marketing based rename is anything to go by, they will end up trying to do so though. Somewhere in the middle of production, the printing on a fully equal bit of silicon, with equal packaging, is bound to get changed. Luc Verhaegen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
