On Tuesday 10 March 2015 09:46:24 Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> I believe you are talking about "mmio-sram"?

Yes.
 
> The syscon here represents a switch, to toggle whether a block of SRAM is
> mapped into the CPU memory space, or to a specific devices private address
> space. It is not the actual SRAM.
> 
> The SRAM DT binding is orthogonal to this, if not irrelevant when the block
> is mapped privately, as it is no longer visible from the DT's PoV.

Ok, got it. I missed this part when reading the introduction. syscon seems
fine to me then.

        Arnd

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to