(The subject has, CedarX is the name of the proprietaries libraries, and by so is not my business.)
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:39:22 +0200 Simos Xenitellis <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it make sense then to just focus on V4L2? > I did not find an initial driver for V4L2. I would think the first > step would be to have a driver that just detects the presence of the > video engine hardware and report any details that the hardware can > provide. > As said we have for more than 1 year all the information(from reverse engineering) need to start, meaning that we could have already a V4l2 driver in somewhat functional state by now. If only there was more support. I took the task to start this driver, but every week there are only distractions, that hit hard in the motivation. And this last weeks are a very good example, to see this huge disregard of the software licenses used. Makes me wonder how in the future the license of this v4l2 driver will be handled. It's very simple, if you all want a proper mainlined driver for this video engine, then you all should "support" the people working to make this a reality. -- Manuel Braga -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
