On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:57:13AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>@@ -368,6 +392,12 @@ static struct mfd_cell axp20x_cells[] = {
> >> .resources = axp20x_pek_resources,
> >> }, {
> >> .name = "axp20x-regulator",
> >>+ }, {
> >>+ .name = "axp20x-usb-power-supply",
> >
> >Could we use either "vbus-power-supply" to match the AXP datasheets,
> >or "otg-power-supply" which is slightly more obvious to board owners?
>
> I do not like the vbus name, since it does not indicate which bus
> it is, OTOH you are right that is what it is called in the datasheet.
>
> As for using otg, I think that usb is better then.
>
> All in all I believe that the current usb name is best, but if others
> disagree I'm open to renaming this.
>
> So anyone else have an opinion on what would be a good name for the
> cell and the compatible ?I usually prefer to use the name mentionned in the datasheet, but if that doesn't make sense, feel free to use an alternative like this one. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
