On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 14:22 +0200, Bernhard Nortmann wrote: > Regarding the 'auto-execution' of code: I think this is somewhat > independent of > the suggested extension to load the main U-Boot binary. It would probably be > useful if the fel utility was able to keep track of addresses it has > written to (this > includes the "write" command), so a later "fel exe" could refer - or > even default - > to them. Maybe it's possible to also introduce 'symbolic' names for specific > addresses? I'm thinking "fel exe uboot" here... (with "uboot" being set / > preserved from the aw_fel_write_uboot_image function)
That does sound cool, but perhaps a lot of work to achieve? Perhaps a simpler thing which would get 80% of the benefit would be to add an --exec flag to the existing command? (Or default on and a flag to not do it, as people prefer). Ian. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
