Le 08/01/2016 12:24, Andre Przywara a écrit : > (resending to add linux-crypto, patches unchanged) > > Hi, > > these two patches provide a different approach to an issue I tried > to fix lately [1]. > Instead of casting everything I now promote local types to size_t, so > that the min3() arguments naturally match in type. > As size_t is defined as "unsigned int" on 32-bit architectures > anyway, that actually does not change anything there, but instead > provides a clean approach to get it compiled for arm64. > > I split this up because 1/2 seems much cleaner to me than 2/2, so we > can have a separate discussion/merge process on this. > > Cheers, > Andre. > > [1] > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-December/395689.html > > Andre Przywara (2): > crypto: sunxi-ss-cipher: promote variables to match types in min3() > calls > crypto: sunxi-ss-hash: promote variables to match types in min3() > calls > > drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-cipher.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c | 12 ++++++------ > drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >
Hello Sorry for this late answer. I am in trouble with those patch, so we have with Andre a long conversation about it. Basically, sun4i-ss will never be available on 64bits platform. (A64 will have a totally new crypto engine). So letting it to compile under 64bit arch is only useful when goal is to add COMPILE_TEST for it. But COMPILE_TEST cannot simply be added with those patch since some arches (x86/x86_64 at least) does not have writesl/readsl available. The conclusion is that it is simpler to block 64bit build for sun4i-ss. Regards LABBE Corentin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
