Quoting Maxime Ripard (2016-06-28 13:45:02) > What's the point of this, if we're not using (or exposing for that > matter) any of it? > > I'm sorry, but the whole point of the initial serie was to rework and > simplify things, precisely because dealing with the clk_factors code > was just too difficult nowadays. And this doesn't solve anything on > that aspect. > > We came with an approach that have all the maintainers involved > agreeing on it, I don't see why we should start over. There's some > useful features there (like tracing). But it's something that can be > added, and should be done differently anyway.
Yes, let's not delay Maxime's work any longer. Stephen and I have requested these changes to the sunxi clock drivers for a long time and now we have them. I intend to merge Maxime's v3 once it addresses the last round of review questions. Regards, Mike > > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering > http://free-electrons.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
