As i recall, some claimed it was needed as we have dma now, but i think this patch still scratches the same itch ...
On July 21, 2016 7:27:12 PM CEST, Michael Weiser <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Mark, > >On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:31:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > >> > What is keeping the patch from being merged (i.e. into mainline)? >> Someone needs to address whatever review comments there were on the >last >> version and submit it. > >That's my point: There don't seem to be any. > >v6 was resend with fixes to checkpatch niggles on v5: >http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-August/363073.html > >v5 addressed comments by Maxime on v4: >http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/244305.html >http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/243995.html > >I can't find any comments on v5 or v6. >-- >Thanks, >Michael -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
