On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:40:20 +0200 Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > > Parenting functions would also not work as expected, > > > clk_hw_get_parent_by_index being the obvious example, in that case > > > returning the empty string for an invalid parent, while it should > > > really return NULL. > > > > I don't see why the clock should be orphan. > > Then, when a parent is "", clk_hw_get_parent_by_index() returns NULL. > > Why? It should return NULL when there's no parent, while you > explicitly registered a parent. "" is not an existing parent. It could be "none" / "dum" / "toto" / ... with the same result: 'this index cannot be used in mux'. -- Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! ** Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
