On 17 October 2016 at 10:26, Alex Gagniuc <mr.nuke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Michal Suchanek <hramr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 14 August 2015 at 01:08, Alex G. <mr.nuke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 08/10/2015 07:54 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>>>> On 10 August 2015 at 15:44, Olliver Schinagl <oliver+l...@schinagl.nl>
>>>>> Hey Michal,
>>>>> As without this patch, we cannot use something like mmc-spi due to the
>>>>> restriction of packet size iirc.
>>>> With DMA we can. And since DMA will be enabled most of the time the
>>>> non-DMA code will receive little or no testing.
>>> That was also an objection over a year ago, when this patch was first
>>> ready, and still, no DMA support is implemented. It would be amazing to
>>> have a way to run larger transfers _today_ :) .
>> The dmaengine patch should get into 4.3 probably.
> And here we are again, over one year later, up to 4.9, and still
> limited to 63 byte transfers.
> A very smart person just brought this up to me today:
> " cool, to bad spi does not work properly on allwinner..."
The patches are out there - eg here
I don't have time to haggle with maintainers which variant is
acceptable atm but you are free to use the thing and/or pick it up and
submit to linux.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.