On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:03:12PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Maxime Ripard > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:33:02AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > >> From: Jagan Teki <[email protected]> > >> > >> Enable FIT_SIGNATURE for sunxi a64. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> Changes for v3: > >> - Move imply outside block > >> Changes for v2: > >> - Use imply instead of select > >> > >> arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > >> index 1fededd..05e2d47 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > >> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ config MACH_SUN50I > >> select SUNXI_DRAM_DW_32BIT > >> select FIT > >> select SPL_LOAD_FIT > >> + imply FIT_SIGNATURE > > > > I'm really not sure we should force it by default. How much code size > > is it adding? > > Why we need to consider u-boot size? (because it may cross the loader2 size?) > Here is the delta of u-boot elf
The same reason than anything else on our arm64 builds lately: we have a u-boot binary too big for the size compared to our environment offset. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
