On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 04:35:20PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:10:34PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > 在 2018年1月22日星期一 CST 下午8:14:35，Maxime Ripard 写道： > > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 07:17:26AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > > > This is the RFC initial patchset for the "new" Allwinner SUNIV ARM9 SoC. > > > > > > > > The same die is packaged differently, come with different co-packaged > > > > DRAM or shipped with different SDK; and then made many model names: F23, > > > > F25, F1C100A, F1C100S, F1C200S, F1C500, F1C600, R6, etc. These SoCs all > > > > share a common feature set and are packaged similarly (eLQFP128 for SoCs > > > > without co-packaged DRAM, QFN88 for with DRAM). As their's no > > > > functionality hidden on the QFN88 models (except DRAM interface not > > > > exported), it's not clever to differentiate them. So I will use suniv as > > > > common name of all these SoCs. > > > > > > Where is that suniv prefix coming from? > > > > The BSP (Melis and Linux). (e.g. "libs/suniv" directory of the Melis SDK > > and > > "arch/arm/boot/dts/sunivw1p1.dtsi" in the Linux SDK) > > Do you have a link to that BSP? > > > > You should really answer two questions here: > > > - Are you able to predict whether you'll find an SoC part of that > > > family in the future that derives a bit and will need a compatible > > > of its own? > > > - Are you able to predict which quirks we'll need along the way to > > > support all the SoCs you've listed there? > > > > > > If you can't answer yes to both these questions, with a 100% > > > certainty, then you'll need a SoC name in the compatible. > > > > > > Which doesn't prevent you from sharing as much as possible the DT like > > > we did between the A10s and the A13 for example. > > > > So the suniv-f1c100s.dtsi will still be kept empty and all peripherals > > known > > should go through suniv.dtsi. > > Sorry if I wasn't really clear. You can totally keep the current DT > structure if that makes sense (and judging by what you're saying, it > does.), but the compatibles should have the SoC name in it.
In case it's not clear, the compatible strings and any new bindings need to be documented. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
