Hello, On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:52:26AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:18:59AM +0800, Hao Zhang wrote: > > + - clocks: From common clock binding, handle to the parent clock. > > + - clock-names: Must contain the clock names described just above. > > [...] > > You seem to have used mux-0 and mux-1 for the clock names. I guess we > don't have to use a name there, we can simply use the position to find > out (as long as it's documented in the binding)
I also wondered if the driver relies on the fact that the second clock is the faster running one. Is this sensible? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
