On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 10:33 PM Maxime Ripard
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 04:22:22PM +0200, Ondřej Jirman wrote:
> > DT would still probably need a re-work in the future, if the PRCM clock
> > modeling the gate would be needed.
>
> Just reacting to that bit.
>
> I know we're pretty bad at this, and the documentation doesn't make it
> any easier, but if you have any idea of how it should be modelled
> next, then do that.

It seems to be just a clock gate, judging by previous (A80/A83T) SoCs.
However since we lack documents for the PRCM, we might need to poke
around to verify that it's actually there.

Or maybe we could ask Allwinner very specific questions, like:

  - Does the PRCM have a gate controlling XO?
  - Is it bit 2 in register 0x44 in the PRCM?

ChenYu

> There's no reason to push it to a later time, it makes everyone's life
> harder.
>
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "linux-sunxi" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to