Hi, On Mon 27 May 19, 00:50, André Przywara wrote: > On 17/04/2019 12:28, Jagan Teki wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 1:52 PM Paul Kocialkowski > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > >> Le vendredi 12 avril 2019 à 14:49 +0530, Jagan Teki a écrit : > >>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 4:08 PM Paul Kocialkowski > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Recent Allwinner platforms (starting with the H3) only use the MUSB > >>>> controller for peripheral mode and use HCI for host mode. As a result, > >>>> extra steps need to be taken to properly route USB signals to one or > >>>> the other. More precisely, the following is required: > >>>> * Routing the pins to either HCI/MUSB (controlled by PHY); > >>>> * Enabling USB PHY passby in HCI mode (controlled by PMU). > >>>> > >>>> The current code will enable passby for each PHY and reroute PHY0 to > >>>> MUSB, which is inconsistent and results in broken USB peripheral support. > >>>> > >>>> Passby on PHY0 must only be enabled when we want to use HCI. Since > >>>> host/device mode detection is not available from the PHY code and > >>>> because U-Boot does not support changing the mode dynamically anyway, > >>>> we can just mux the controller to MUSB if it is enabled and mux it to > >>>> HCI otherwise. > >>>> > >>>> This fixes USB peripheral support for platforms with PHY0 dual-route, > >>>> especially H3/H5 and V3s. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <[email protected]> > >>>> --- > >>>> drivers/phy/allwinner/phy-sun4i-usb.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > >>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/allwinner/phy-sun4i-usb.c > >>>> b/drivers/phy/allwinner/phy-sun4i-usb.c > >>>> index f206fa3f5d48..4f1c7e519d71 100644 > >>>> --- a/drivers/phy/allwinner/phy-sun4i-usb.c > >>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/allwinner/phy-sun4i-usb.c > >>>> @@ -302,9 +302,21 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_init(struct phy *phy) > >>>> data->cfg->disc_thresh, > >>>> PHY_DISCON_TH_LEN); > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_MUSB_SUNXI > >>>> + /* Needed for HCI and conflicts with MUSB, keep PHY0 on MUSB */ > >>>> + if (usb_phy->id != 0) > >>>> + sun4i_usb_phy_passby(phy, true); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* Route PHY0 to MUSB to allow USB gadget */ > >>>> + if (data->cfg->phy0_dual_route) > >>>> + sun4i_usb_phy0_reroute(data, true); > >>>> +#else > >>>> sun4i_usb_phy_passby(phy, true); > >>>> > >>>> - sun4i_usb_phy0_reroute(data, true); > >>>> + /* Route PHY0 to HCI to allow USB host */ > >>>> + if (data->cfg->phy0_dual_route) > >>>> + sun4i_usb_phy0_reroute(data, false); > >>>> +#endif > >>> > >>> I think we can manage this route and passby dynamically by detecting > >>> id since we have dr_mode verify the MUSB host or peripheral via > >>> usb_get_dr_mode, any chance to try that way? > >> > >> Oh, I didn't know that U-Boot has support for usb_get_dr_mode these > >> days. Thanks! > >> > >> So far, the sunxi port has been using Kconfig to distinguish between > >> host/device (unless I'm mistaken?) so I feel like this should be a > >> separate follow-up patch to convert the sunxi MUSB glue + PHY to > >> detecting dr_mode using usb_get_dr_mode. This feels like a significant > >> rework, too. > > > > Yes. > > > >> > >> Also, how should we handle the OTG case? I'm not sure we can support > >> having both musb host and gadget built-in at this point. But that would > >> certainly be welcome as part of the rework, too. > >> > >> What do you think? > > > > You mean handling dr_mode at runtime. > > > > If yes, It is bit new where we can register the musb as UCLASS_MISC > > wrapper and decide to bind driver for host and peripheral by decoding > > dr_mode. and indeed host should register with UCLASS_USB and > > peripheral with UCLASS_USB_GADGET_GENERIC. > > > > I tried this wrapper before, not placed in-between because of other > > work but TI musb has similar code to manage this > > drivers/usb/musb-new/ti-musb.c > > Before we go wild with any fancy rework, can we possibly take this patch > as it? As I realised, this is basically a better version of the patch I > sent two weeks ago [1]. I tried Paul's patch back then, but was missing > the phys property in the DT, which I addressed in patch 2/2. > > So I would appreciate if we can take this patch, as it solves a real > problem (upper USB port not working) on many Pine64 boards (given the > small DT change is in place). And on those boards the OTG functionality > is not really feasible anyway, as VBUS is either permanently enabled or > at least tied to the other host port's supply, so we can't turn it off > for peripheral mode.
Looks like nothing has moved forward on this (quite significant) fixup. Could we please merge it as soon as time allows? Cheers and thanks in advance, Paul > Cheers, > Andre. > > [1] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-May/369521.html -- Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin Embedded Linux and kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/20190712094438.GI15882%40aptenodytes. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
